IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] Requesting TSVWG adoption of SCE draft-morton-tsvwg-sce

Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> Thu, 14 November 2019 20:32 UTC

Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A345A12002E for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:32:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.748
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.748 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SN3LxQ0SXhCi for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:32:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x833.google.com (mail-qt1-x833.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::833]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F82D120072 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:32:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x833.google.com with SMTP id y10so8307979qto.3 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:32:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GLDdSzDwL8FQt3gHQ+pl10LpQsisDgAqTDAhQDXWYow=; b=jJJPiRTgHJCWuBkvbVmfJrEu7sev1CY5AEMx2mrY3M9Ov+nvjSHD8rxOIGIx5YWohN /s302XwQy+M8O3QW+4zKTTL6zVub0teck2p5SFHI5QhRJab16uYsVShNaB7oXBpEpZKB P8/LrGH+8OJoweBZnPH8VdPJRRXcGVM0Tg7MZG2gPyiNw8m05N7ILI/jSp6VIuuKXNEV cw4yQNl9NGCXbTZlVn7Enccs0ZTsD1Xlrta/d+fbAoPh3P6sXrV2BlYpx0mY4Djc9uUG ff1ExbfJwmDP+BAzyaxKRx3/BAGMEijB5AKeHvhQbEoty2TUVH71Z5m+qzN9m77MS8ed /M3A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GLDdSzDwL8FQt3gHQ+pl10LpQsisDgAqTDAhQDXWYow=; b=ovhzeLm7SDdWfqIP6EhKknlGOvJt8/QFwkNvYXo4B4G6VR/1hKr7vU2I2TfJKaKGai CQvcJ6blwdBYVKo7WRdw7QOHEG/m/vFJoZCa5Oc1S04j24NuNePahHpxZImYG7HxPDgt 4C9j4ReFtYgT3H3CArdtU5PH8/37YJ4HY/xKJlyZ1jQVIIK9MNehYd2zlK7M0APjh2d5 b8vQRG9RVPnOG7cBhYrg51ZXiWBS+YcpXjNAMCFHviBVHhCVYPKbUa1tN2694TvPOrDz MHneJdNhbs0WccYbSgRUPz8Ixv34Mzrs0RsPqdXg/B9zYV7ajd+a37oqBW3NvxWFpofK tvvg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXV6XqakngG+rdAYq2jjnvaMLSJC4ojryxPgbSzdDvpqaEKkDii FKJfUATjiEY610V8Buu3/kE1KdAy6RGc2Dysh2QxGw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxDMa7uUsPtb5NlRVmYiX6hyML7bvQFrepY/kGTjMtJz0YJhuqE6HelBSRhQMh+Wp4nAaNCwwHfzct397xJd/s=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:46cd:: with SMTP id h13mr10374679qto.101.1573763575358; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:32:55 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a0c:e48b:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:32:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 2002:a0c:e48b:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:32:54 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5DCDA202.9030903@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
References: <201911141350.xAEDo99J048928@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> <AM4PR07MB34590617DFA85A76377E002FB9710@AM4PR07MB3459.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <8A1A0F64-9B46-442F-9CAC-BFBA884E1B10@gmx.de> <5DCDA202.9030903@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 22:32:54 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJq5cE2x6T8O3pRfF3nRAPwC=pk5ifHEs9VZmNYdfj3VHRSD1g@mail.gmail.com>
To: G Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Cc: tsvwg@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000dea76605975462a6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/S5JvpwTgvDjpf0SXvrXZ8WK0r3s>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Requesting TSVWG adoption of SCE draft-morton-tsvwg-sce
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 20:32:59 -0000

On 14 Nov 2019 20:51, "G Fairhurst" <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> I think we could do better to keep the discussion focussed on why the
IETF would need an additional level of signal (aka ECT(0)->SCE->CE->Loss)
and whether this has implications on existing RFCs and the chartered work.

On this point I agree.

Meanwhile I will simply note that I disagree on a factual basis with
several of Koen's points.  More detail will have to wait until I and my
colleagues are not stuck in airports in multiple timezones.

- Jonathan Morton

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email