Re: [tsvwg] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-09.txt

[Gorry Fairhurst <[e-mail]>]

See below.

On 03/11/2019, 21:32, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
> small nit, Page 2:
>
> "As discussed in [RFC7258], Pervasive Monitoring (PM) nis a technical"
>
> seems to contain a spurious n...
>
Excellent - you looked at this - and sorry, we'll fix this and anything 
else people spot in the next rev.

Gorry
>
>
>> On Nov 3, 2019, at 22:09, Gorry Fairhurst<[e-mail]>  wrote:
>>
>>
>> We've just posted a revision following the WGLC comments...
>>
>> Gorry
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: 	[tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-09.txt
>>
>>
>> 	
>>
>> 	
>>
>> 	
>>
>> 	
>>
>> 	
>>
>>
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>> This draft is a work item of the Transport Area Working Group WG of the IETF.
>>
>>         Title           : Considerations around Transport Header Confidentiality, Network Operations, and the Evolution of Internet Transport Protocols
>>         Authors         : Godred Fairhurst
>>                           Colin Perkins
>> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-09.txt
>> 	Pages           : 47
>> 	Date            : 2019-11-03
>>
>> Abstract:
>>    To protect user data and privacy, Internet transport protocols have
>>    supported payload encryption and authentication for some time.  Such
>>    encryption and authentication is now also starting to be applied to
>>    the transport protocol headers.  This helps avoid transport protocol
>>    ossification by middleboxes, while also protecting metadata about the
>>    communication.  Current operational practice in some networks inspect
>>    transport header information within the network, but this is no
>>    longer possible when those transport headers are encrypted.  This
>>    document discusses the possible impact when network traffic uses a
>>    protocol with an encrypted transport header.  It suggests issues to
>>    consider when designing new transport protocols, to account for
>>    network operations, prevent network ossification, and enable
>>    transport evolution, while still respecting user privacy.
>>
>>
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt/
>>
>> There are also htmlized versions available at:
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-09
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-09
>>
>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-09
>>
>>
>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>