Re: [tsvwg] travel funds for ietf for the next SCE talk?

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Fri, 10 May 2019 14:24 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4713120203 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 May 2019 07:24:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mzoTs4CGSnzp for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 May 2019 07:24:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22e.google.com (mail-lj1-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DF431201DD for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 May 2019 07:24:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id z5so5247863lji.10 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 May 2019 07:24:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=zVUCRyaRDlFaYhh48IeWO1d6I2EZgGBgmgmu1QHhgBw=; b=A1OvhC4gt37u0sB9zoAqjmrfBvPL/DAS5CqwMvoukos5U6aeFobuZZS26t8+XU7T4r nP3xAlnEa8XBfspSjV/GVmq+KD/+3x/0QLRcyqabZe5rV48WBnauzxedcjYk4LyyILiI sH6A0BQNGIEDFpt7GkJN8wCwy4Hyunq8iLCzY0NF0Y/WJerIdCv41ajSr3+GwFh4zy9v cNrHwsgl8NivwsMRrMgB3W90ZWRp8PBMMBdn7HsceWglEQVcFKCIQwO5YcRE/sQaF75R W9M8miYYa4U/MNdAkV4Eqa8xrQX5CATyJyJeaOCnWA/cOsSHWuzujod3WkEi4E/8oCys 3tHQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zVUCRyaRDlFaYhh48IeWO1d6I2EZgGBgmgmu1QHhgBw=; b=Y+ZaDyimfIX/8zW1hPTA2Lu60JjKYycQpE9r19KjcVRAWD27hET+VnCoX7A1hzcRHI jgFItas1r9l2zPjvH4RLifBopZ5vISOD9Os5ZBsJr8HpmOmXIL6f6FH4eaCNGtw1xyU6 8tY641vOPSmJuxxt0O8EucY/X8pFH+jvJj2oVlY0k/bowHPTh9iEeu49b4+dbjy9Qb4i szkmQasBQjoPG6yUHUn2z4OpaBz1dueg/u48JYBbJuG2cucfnGUq0KA0pNosvY6/sNqF kWznHhlQWwoHeZ/EvAX+oYhkhexKpJVM9uNq5O9ki/Wy5wXTD2zldCG0ulxhUW/EUS4B pBBA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAULvyh3jyBwO30R7w5pSUpBS6kk83TSYX3ZHDCsLP4vRH5eEOUE xfNHgGaSO+HbREc8/SQqpOcF2z7YwnO6bGTl++/UTg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxiV1qTSZZeOxMvec+yIniNqtiq5ek5JmZCEX6xlxKRdPZDNr9e+mdFecy74E2T/17h9rp9nSJCjZkr+GZjILM=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:1f02:: with SMTP id f2mr6066007ljf.86.1557498269642; Fri, 10 May 2019 07:24:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAA93jw7eZ0Rfvc+tUKx0mG_Bdxqos-DTBn=ojYJCM0UCh38ScA@mail.gmail.com> <HE1PR0701MB25221DA057496B1A89FD391B95390@HE1PR0701MB2522.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAA93jw4V6328H2awWmSnhJnKgKASqy-9yXY=ke3JgcMxLiRY2A@mail.gmail.com> <C302B225-7806-4D6D-9ECE-FA3EFD6D7CA4@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <C302B225-7806-4D6D-9ECE-FA3EFD6D7CA4@strayalpha.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 07:23:53 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBMG9o94pJTV7JTDpHjt9XT5e3i-GQZXN3Tcb2K9Z4kRuQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
Cc: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, tsvwg IETF list <tsvwg@ietf.org>, ECN-Sane <ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000019c90c05888953aa"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/St20vtLpJzdtMY5m3LqwAeHvPEA>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] travel funds for ietf for the next SCE talk?
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 14:24:33 -0000

On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 6:47 AM Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> wrote:

> Although this is a side issue....
>
> > On May 10, 2019, at 2:17 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Unlike all the other conferences we attend, speakers are not
> > recompensed for their costs in the IETF, either.
>
> Speakers at conferences are not compensated. They register like everyone
> else - that has been ACM, IEEE, IFiP, and OSA policy - I know because in
> some cases, I *wrote* the policy. Students are typically required to
> register at the full rate if they present. In the majority of cases, even
> the chairs pay their own way or at best are comp’d registration.
>

It actually varies. I have been comped where I was asked to give an Invited
Talk.

That said, the IETF is very different from an academic conference, and i
think it would clearly be impractical for the IETF to comp registration for
everyone who presented.

-Ekr


>
> Speakers at trade shows are paid, as are some (but not all) keynotes and
> tutorial presenters.  The latter often get only honoraria and a comp’d reg,
> not enough for travel/lodging in most cases.
>
> The only  people who get a fully free ride that I know of are the IEEE
> Comsoc Board.
>
> Joe
>