Re: [tsvwg] draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb, more questions

Greg White <g.white@CableLabs.com> Thu, 07 November 2019 23:36 UTC

Return-Path: <g.white@CableLabs.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D8DC1200C4 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 15:36:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cablelabs.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3tb1OPP-l0dn for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 15:36:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NAM05-DM3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr730109.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.73.109]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C97C12002F for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 15:36:00 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=iMKRY+uHcPBVO8yw7D7RQ9N+yHhQuiktEMc2P4iBnxg02ZN0dWE28Xa8C8T/YZG1leuRrVbdq2f6iid3jMe/kfPWknie0QRbDAfFdqRBnAFlAIhrldmRcBsGBU3JKOPSEklTF4GsNIbpBX6BTBYz6mMhnec/pGhn+angrwpCikF4++bxDA0EZ2tK33V9F04KeBA+nzHbICD5p3KOTgg3EPzoeRDmQ/9VJLcsNJ9wSGBgKfXvNcHooPS6k4Yx0S8aiIcH/Qku+VFj2C8WjXFyKUheNvfyxbJN0AQ7wxwCR6TuXP+v+I+qRufnOSd0IOmFd7dN+/qJvr6lqqbVfDP7FA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=wmHnyZk4xCprZuzzoCAKG/LIyhubXyPClkYXnpGz+D4=; b=JxblYQgsXAslWRGkyk+lohZ9focHLKFmJ33h/TOB08JlLVx+jTQDna7WEkYogDFfyCMIeN2FZf6ncIxhYPnCTUDXDQInCAe4T64676ZDT4RRNNdZ4doVDXTtny55XSw9HI7PhAqiAnEy/+dDHvQOt0UPBVzSGst5TDBCYBEAqMGNqcKSgKn4+CBPUlON7EX/yYaX2M8Q9Z4A5rmNfaJd2BtBZNQCFsURJO3Ki6rmN6RODldJ6+X6H34Q5j+ZP4cQkH/bdRuWRs/mwWO13064JG6Zk7TvSK8A7eKqDebWEQcGobd0yQ1J4YVC/jHlDsM08DLqFC6JqXg9igkxFGbMTQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cablelabs.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cablelabs.com; dkim=pass header.d=cablelabs.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cablelabs.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=wmHnyZk4xCprZuzzoCAKG/LIyhubXyPClkYXnpGz+D4=; b=hA/7TshVWc6VRWlM7DuaHhP5uZMEjS6/30E80tdHK/rgaQjbbs3Ntm5Y6VvEvPSjMThgZvtN7oepEtlBiJbARndWvmf5W2rJWT8z5wUz+Q6qvik8rpCR7Uv9X0oRkjDlBzN/xsSWgnP3e9SLddl0hnSFxLsS5otXMdrHgAIDCBc=
Received: from SN6PR06MB4655.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (52.135.117.85) by SN6PR06MB4846.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (52.135.112.10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2408.24; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 23:35:57 +0000
Received: from SN6PR06MB4655.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::cd06:3025:a8a3:f4bd]) by SN6PR06MB4655.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::cd06:3025:a8a3:f4bd%6]) with mapi id 15.20.2408.024; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 23:35:57 +0000
From: Greg White <g.white@CableLabs.com>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
CC: tsvwg IETF list <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [tsvwg] draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb, more questions
Thread-Index: AQHVk165eBM5r7+4T0OsGmssaWIedad7Q86AgAED3YCAA3w6gIAAgvKA//+W+ACAAHzrAP//kWMA
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 23:35:57 +0000
Message-ID: <47078C4E-F136-43F8-908A-EEBA59BC9665@cablelabs.com>
References: <90ED003C-CC25-4ED4-90D8-BA572E39D852@gmx.de> <AC0FF00A-9AA7-4582-8F96-1E4E27AEB8D8@cablelabs.com> <20DE8A61-AD71-4C60-A90E-1CCB22E3C6BE@gmx.de> <FA5AC140-F5AA-410B-8067-1B042868049A@cablelabs.com> <CCE580A4-4075-4E2D-9392-DB35389F289B@gmx.de> <28A4C4A8-91C6-4C3F-8563-F862A7247833@cablelabs.com> <084B4D20-5A54-45EE-9519-469BC860C088@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <084B4D20-5A54-45EE-9519-469BC860C088@gmx.de>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1c.0.190812
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=g.white@CableLabs.com;
x-originating-ip: [2620:0:2b10:22:19f9:821c:a410:a105]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 602b265e-5eb8-4f76-8117-08d763db3d4f
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SN6PR06MB4846:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <SN6PR06MB4846CD46880CFF4AC2C3B7FCEE780@SN6PR06MB4846.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 0214EB3F68
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(396003)(136003)(39850400004)(366004)(376002)(346002)(189003)(199004)(58126008)(76176011)(11346002)(14444005)(2906002)(6436002)(256004)(102836004)(7736002)(486006)(91956017)(81166006)(305945005)(4744005)(446003)(71200400001)(6116002)(5660300002)(229853002)(25786009)(66556008)(186003)(8676002)(46003)(476003)(86362001)(36756003)(71190400001)(2616005)(14454004)(81156014)(6486002)(66946007)(6916009)(478600001)(99286004)(76116006)(6512007)(64756008)(316002)(66476007)(6246003)(33656002)(66446008)(8936002)(4326008)(6506007)(85282002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:SN6PR06MB4846; H:SN6PR06MB4655.namprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: CableLabs.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: VArUq/472QtgToZGyHPINPImP5jw7L3crcQml9ul4DfiD1k5jeRI7j1BLLPlXC3teJ4zvIhZHexuUErJTUHe0pifdzW2SAyxVf2z4ezDAfP8lCu+MyjUb13bp0uIZ3h6R8mVjZcPpABay2NDsbdNSwwU0BYYgvosBoXVIpqtHJUc5HQ+zW6AZsDO6yx9gcsJkuB3cwZ3qhCvRRlTCvbw2CBwjq1avi3U1AJG+YrNy4JkN0BpiEmeCej0Mu2TPE+o7d6Qqrqm/xhxuTTa95QQbVJCAAtlE4QtA+K4wvVEmqmmW6k2aCVk8dS/ybVUSk4N5EGZ5NpY8wSKnmC8YTMjsCRsMPKEqxmWcv2HxDFzz6hdsGOseSMyQ7N4EQQkd33jYKx5Y0lY5DDGRzlU8AfXXQSWNPwlhcCCMX6YYskPSmeusqkOUdigkdPy4yBKKpse
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <216A8041217AA5429A934D444240131C@namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: cablelabs.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 602b265e-5eb8-4f76-8117-08d763db3d4f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 07 Nov 2019 23:35:57.2793 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: ce4fbcd1-1d81-4af0-ad0b-2998c441e160
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: F4GGFi1zEEUjtegyZohiNq6nZQSpySz4XY8MHTSnp4KOTvraUMuauUBBU7rAWSYO4bA+2Ge+Rdmv13zGbFY3hg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN6PR06MB4846
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/T8H3iLiswT3NPCooL9KpFRVjsq0>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb, more questions
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2019 23:36:03 -0000

I meant to respond to this point as well:  

    > I believe that the reason that RFC 8325 simply wrings its hands over this issue, as opposed to solving it, is that A) it is a *really* hard problem to solve in an unmanaged network, and B) while it is certainly a problem in theory, there is no evidence that it is a real problem in practice.
    
    	[SM] The problem is that there is simply no data, and interpreting this as there is no problem is neither solid science nor engineering. If you have measurements showing that this is no problem with the expected traffic rates with the NQB marking, please feel free to post them to the list or as PM.
    
[GW] One data point is that most consumer routers ship with WMM enabled by default.  If there were rampant misuse of DSCP such that WMM was unusable, I would expect that many APs would ship with it disabled by default, and let the user decide whether to risk turning it on.