IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tsvwg] algorithm 5 (was Re: WGLC for Port Randomization starts now (April 1st))

Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org> Thu, 28 May 2009 15:03 UTC

Return-Path: <mallman@icir.org>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 088AC28C125 for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 May 2009 08:03:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.488
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.488 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.111, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id st-O99n5hxwO for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 May 2009 08:03:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pork.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (pork.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU [192.150.186.19]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A051928C23C for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 May 2009 08:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from guns.icir.org (adsl-69-222-35-58.dsl.bcvloh.ameritech.net [69.222.35.58]) by pork.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n4SF2S3d014690; Thu, 28 May 2009 08:02:28 -0700
Received: from lawyers.icir.org (unknown [69.222.35.58]) by guns.icir.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 265943A659DB; Thu, 28 May 2009 11:02:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lawyers.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lawyers.icir.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F31729BA47; Thu, 28 May 2009 11:02:23 -0400 (EDT)
To: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
From: Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org>
In-Reply-To: <4A1DA1CE.8020804@gont.com.ar>
Organization: International Computer Science Institute (ICSI)
Song-of-the-Day: Lawyers, Guns and Money
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="--------ma42878-1"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 11:02:23 -0400
Sender: mallman@icir.org
Message-Id: <20090528150223.0F31729BA47@lawyers.icir.org>
Cc: Alfred Hönes <ah@tr-sys.de>, "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>, tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] algorithm 5 (was Re: WGLC for Port Randomization starts now (April 1st))
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mallman@icir.org
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 15:03:11 -0000

> > (It is my fault the
> > I-D is wrong.  The paper is not clear enough.)  So, I'd prefer if these
> > were synced up just to avoid confusion.  
> 
> Yes, that's what I was meaning to do.

To me you sync them and call it a day.  I.e., I see no reason for
describing another riff.

allman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email