IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] AD Evaluation comments for draft-ietf-tsvwg-ieee-802-11-07

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 19 September 2017 22:46 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BBB0132944; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 15:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EIgH-zbESkrq; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 15:46:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x230.google.com (mail-yw0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4484513219E; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 15:46:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x230.google.com with SMTP id u205so767907ywa.5; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 15:46:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=nzldbrPcsEex10XVzjwvhQLSUH9GT2GkUy5mOWFB85o=; b=TFokv8Nb5xmdzZoVUddnk2DRG+jnOhHb4SGN+pYRmVESKanUWU4Op6/PvOAOwGrOLW wRkrJEPZS4CURtsLQMBp+VlVU3LrSmY5LUA8JlUNPYp5J3hDCc7VkpVYpe2Kgjc1Lgfs mCk/We8Hg4x4ZgRROfojws0LYAg2wrEuURVuQQJPSLj6u0/TeCTBJngxPDmmlM6exbxt EeuygISVZiK08MnBGMoGZhvrk1ro+m7Qk9qgmWZPEunnWRmNa/UTdGXNMmp+apvngCW2 RpRyRnjnubXONVDtet13Bu0C4edpll3l2Q2NlSdPq5JZmBsYwwwbugtl34jCGT53J0UK hOMg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nzldbrPcsEex10XVzjwvhQLSUH9GT2GkUy5mOWFB85o=; b=WCWt1YzjrKPpj42n2X4EcDpoQG1jWsbG9K4eexpBzBG6jZx+jLdMEjUR98LVp6T+Jv YapOZsV1+GmPR+Zt50c1sKocBlsifbQzhja5/+/HFzw1120m8ldGh/meAM3E1SBWJ1VM GwDxIBAw99km2Jmswk0OmeZbGncWnOWvtdHG18kFW4HUYfquaoFVnSsh3tCdXq+jp5Qx K0Igs+1NQgBMj3nH0xAIRE+nGWvpbABEPhBj62B4X//Wn1YAy9mX2cbsjioXkbHRbM1D X7DFMg/r1W3H3ZauLNzrXUrNT/rjT4sh+/hQFKCK7QX1BCkJ6Ni22C014krYUw2jawAl p14Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUjTxUttyQ6xO7lZPWxDl69t1XDI8G2LZ36jmeipKMAuOx07Ffmn YuLQbJrSlxLZHzQiSsU1AspeIQ3Wr8uRBvGNzkw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QBpTuG5l0oBSpjc3r/9IM9P0X6uwagJsb24P1HSqpS2go9LNhfnNeVTGsS40M6K7vBREyzygmn5P7FUScPQ/2Y=
X-Received: by 10.37.107.13 with SMTP id g13mr1919188ybc.211.1505861182131; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 15:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.2.15 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 15:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <dc3d512a82ba44a39e286fdfbafbbf83@XCH-RCD-010.cisco.com>
References: <CAKKJt-dnnYxO0C9ahXURu8aDjpRP=vtKn8z2JsiRm+YP+mLrVw@mail.gmail.com> <b0d50d3b2488488b8ef4f621a776eed5@XCH-RCD-010.cisco.com> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949362FC59749@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com> <CAKKJt-fLm0kT6LR7fqX4RvyOBeU6NsXqJOKzih=6Y76fqvhdDw@mail.gmail.com> <dc3d512a82ba44a39e286fdfbafbbf83@XCH-RCD-010.cisco.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 17:46:21 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-eif=FVGu7W_y79nKvwMx0Cw-4nEsqtEog=vmKL7A5+jg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Tim Szigeti (szigeti)" <szigeti@cisco.com>
Cc: "Black, David" <David.Black@dell.com>, "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-tsvwg-ieee-802-11@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-tsvwg-ieee-802-11@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e082659d4d794cb055992a09d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/TZ9gzu91HdlLSdp7JQYt3UEMJtA>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] AD Evaluation comments for draft-ietf-tsvwg-ieee-802-11-07
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 22:46:25 -0000

Dear David the Document Shepherd,

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:18 PM, Tim Szigeti (szigeti) <szigeti@cisco.com>
wrote:

> Hi Spencer,
>
>
>
> I made the minor change requested; now the sentence avoids the loaded term
> ‘should consider’.
>
>
>
> Suffice it to say that the security of the devices and networks
> implementing QoS, including QoS mapping between wired and wireless
> networks, merits consideration in actual deployments.
>
>
>
> (Thanks David for bringing this to our attention).
>
>
>
> With that done, I think we’re ready for Last Call.
>

Ready for me to pull the trigger?

Spencer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email