Re: [tsvwg] Your NQB presentation

Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> Fri, 22 November 2019 02:38 UTC

Return-Path: <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AD8912012A for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 18:38:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IzFca6tD1-WC for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 18:38:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-out01.uio.no (mail-out01.uio.no [IPv6:2001:700:100:10::50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9865B12010F for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 18:38:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-mx10.uio.no ([129.240.10.27]) by mail-out01.uio.no with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1iXyqN-0003pd-Bs for tsvwg@ietf.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 03:38:47 +0100
Received: from dhcp-96d5.meeting.ietf.org ([31.133.150.213]) by mail-mx10.uio.no with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) user michawe (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1iXyqM-0004Pb-F1 for tsvwg@ietf.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 03:38:47 +0100
From: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6A823681-EB7D-4B68-9B9E-3476F4EBA7CB"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:38:42 +0800
References: <B654E9D3-A5E2-45AC-A4D3-E86757263CFB@gmx.de> <490F228F-57B3-430F-ABC8-38350E44EAC7@cablelabs.com>
To: tsvwg IETF list <tsvwg@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <490F228F-57B3-430F-ABC8-38350E44EAC7@cablelabs.com>
Message-Id: <AAEB98A9-9524-4772-B9D2-95E10DD90677@ifi.uio.no>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-UiO-SPF-Received: Received-SPF: neutral (mail-mx10.uio.no: 31.133.150.213 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of ifi.uio.no) client-ip=31.133.150.213; envelope-from=michawe@ifi.uio.no; helo=dhcp-96d5.meeting.ietf.org;
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.0, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5, uiobl=NO, uiouri=NO)
X-UiO-Scanned: 11E2EF2A5D8E329761B82008A6BDD10901C5FD21
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/TvYVoaBiuCUsRC9LStzbj00iCrQ>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Your NQB presentation
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 02:38:52 -0000

Just as a data point,

> I think we share the belief that the vast majority (all?) residential ISPs currently bleach ALL DSCPs to default for their residential customers, and so the 0x2A value will already be handled in the same manner, but these requirements and the (to be written) informative text will help ensure operators only deviate from that default state consciously.

“all?” / ALL would contradict with at least one measurement study. See:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166531619300203 <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166531619300203>
(where at least the ARK nodes count as “residential”), and references therein.

Cheers,
Michael