IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] [Ecn-sane] is FQ actually widely deployed?

Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> Tue, 23 July 2019 06:06 UTC

Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5804312004F for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 23:06:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.748
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.748 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2haI7oP-LhF2 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 23:06:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x730.google.com (mail-qk1-x730.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::730]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAAFE120041 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 23:06:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x730.google.com with SMTP id s145so30301491qke.7 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 23:06:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=MuReIfqygtao2RFBwnhezmiuZsAqYumhX6n5NxEbbSI=; b=oYdvOQRzwF/0TFsnxLMqKauEPljB8IG8vOjYsYQAyWWnugG+4TUBQRHIXHzgUk5OLI NaQLM9l1I3FY1J91PoY6irRvwFLiiWvC+LSeqPgR2uwafGSQN1JiRjP3w1M3Jb9ttOY5 XVuQHo4nCOtoyvHK7J8hBKTRxytogCalFxYVA7JDmJHMARgDCTesczoRYv59ZuGR4VeF vf4eidqIg8tSUh5tDAGN4CUBmJx0qZ/zKMO6ZP/Ah5GVubBEar1rdqIu3VBTlzT1r+7h aRZfVESLwguM9mg90rW5uY1wr9/9RuOqA4u4MvdtFEb+1gIrPOm7Wt+sFUtjkLB7itPr VEjQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=MuReIfqygtao2RFBwnhezmiuZsAqYumhX6n5NxEbbSI=; b=B3YGB2r3loxMmNGUJDr4ye2pjG2DT+5u0TqTt65vii8QAzx84tiPOqL3Ffz/d5HcVp Tt7riuplFXC2jD3FvqXUkaAfpE7HYkV4LMcnXQcyXv1fwmiMDDgSQI9zvl/+C46pyb+1 0VF8Ews81jNUtE3dNyrLAbrSBM74nudcv/AJ1ah/n9YVbcw1b3AnMX+r279MT2DZTSf2 OPjVfebPh4eu3RooDGuxBPfNwMBx0Up4OrbnSTlLkx+P6xEJWEEIqoztIsx539kDkTVm EvkDi3A9CmenutFk/a2GwS9lSxhPjdB+5mQt0zd3cADAt22CmW7zxnW2kzk7fax8nX8q h3cw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVNYFA7yk3Z1OiRWio2yQHr19a8N4ewt1AHdgwwoCIHHutZ/AHq al64uewsBUoROCBD/UnkqNU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzok00ghpuu6kPv2D+9A1ufhjWnqY6zII4X96LQsUvB6QzCQQnsVvQbjIENw5gcHCpTEjXfJg==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:9904:: with SMTP id b4mr46835591qke.159.1563861969083; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 23:06:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jonathartonsmbp.lan (173-246-8-242.qc.cable.ebox.net. [173.246.8.242]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d20sm17396713qto.59.2019.07.22.23.06.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 22 Jul 2019 23:06:08 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BAC8C466-E215-46AE-9D30-591A82055633@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 02:06:07 -0400
Cc: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>, Jonathan Foulkes <jfoulkes@evenroute.com>, "ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net" <ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net>, Dave Taht <dave@taht.net>, "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4E959AE1-9616-4F30-B93B-76BE5BA3D278@gmail.com>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1907221609330.19225@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CEECD0B0-7081-42DE-AA2C-5061749C9232@gmail.com> <87sgqy3sqh.fsf@toke.dk> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1907230730580.19225@uplift.swm.pp.se> <BAC8C466-E215-46AE-9D30-591A82055633@gmx.de>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/UQb55KWbUxM23mS-afT2zedQqko>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] [Ecn-sane] is FQ actually widely deployed?
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 06:06:13 -0000

> On 23 Jul, 2019, at 1:57 am, Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> This is my min gripe with accelerators and off-load features, typically they side-step the linux kernel network stack and offer far less features than that stack (this is how they speed up things).

May I introduce you to https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-morton-tsvwg-cheap-nasty-queueing-00 ?  I'm also in the process of expanding the LFQ draft.  I think they show that HW acceleration *shouldn't* mean just dumb FIFOs.

> IMHO these are crutches and at least up to 1Gbps links reasonable priced x86/x64 hardware can do routing with all bells and whistles

I'd actually be rather interested to see what a Raspberry Pi 4 with a GigE USB3 dongle tacked on can cope with, now that it has native GigE through a direct PHY connection instead of via a USB2 bottleneck.  That would be in the rough price range of a basic wifi router, and I've already got a Pi 2B running as an SCE endpoint.

Any idea which shops I should look in while I'm in Montreal?

 - Jonathan Morton

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email