IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-heist-tsvwg-ecn-deployment-observations-00.txt

Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> Fri, 19 February 2021 11:48 UTC

Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2985B3A0927 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 03:48:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.847
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.847 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TtU9SMWC8THT for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 03:48:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22c.google.com (mail-lj1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 735EF3A0922 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 03:48:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id r23so18710993ljh.1 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 03:48:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=TDNZBa5m+TRoRqRrNEM+UtL8Nk6T0nvzlm/ERg7RQwo=; b=BjmmXA/4MJ5v5nYpbV7v/MN6w66VDZeVOtC2JvtGx5I4ySpd7ZJ+YwhkZz/YqueXjT QD5MaYcRIHhPLvLakIjHYQnv2zWu8rh0D7q7iGAjMAOChcBQWq/55wlOV4MoyTHyTPuy 84lWIi3EAf/5N+hgaXzYt3tnqbOy7mKc2jgEr5dHJmV0MpxY0G77ME7P9MhS7qELerFY skIYPIrxYuh0WijUDy4k7jNyfkYnaBpOzOk5jqOnlLPQLFkiYXIR2a/bA7G4GBX/zhBS ad7GOrfgjPubNK9nXcDw/NDJ37CSd5zBiN0RBoZueaZ6RNKZPkUQqvatkOIBSVGy28Y2 ezxw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=TDNZBa5m+TRoRqRrNEM+UtL8Nk6T0nvzlm/ERg7RQwo=; b=iqGauxgsqfqcUWS5OqtPGdpI6kQ4/as4Tl985RxCBgC3/JG41ULEmoVxWi5iPgYxQA rr5KxON8u5IAKSh8BfvjKILA7Xz9PFOB5joLiQqP0hggL27etcUsogZdkIFZdBYnT1Rw gm/a7Tx+pqWOFOvksM4Gxgfr2CCR5J12zKrQaPn2m/zdz9/vd98LhfWA8V3OTtxEClTm uizvXUhotdidIvsx2J1XE2JB9rNGmhjHGbtI9OQH+II8BjnbR7Db+Z62o3rdqTPfCWGx FPSCQ7+NUUt1+QdVB8eBsJmd96tncWc92J+urOCoIX8oLDseZNAzhf6jO6McT/Eka3GJ H9NQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532fzLl7nu0tdGWWEmeGJSZ7fh+/U42pUUsBMz1Dondqe287+tZh Rq+7+QwAWQNr5uj4011Djxs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyeZ6fu5lC/Z9gErui4g33Z4irJMFw4b24+PBe5BoWwVkvALKJ/YLiMaPvUDWIla13FHGybCA==
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5f6c:: with SMTP id c12mr2989818lfc.316.1613735323237; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 03:48:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jonathartonsmbp.lan (188-67-254-178.bb.dnainternet.fi. [188.67.254.178]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b39sm905149ljf.68.2021.02.19.03.48.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 19 Feb 2021 03:48:42 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.7\))
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <29EBB69A-2A00-4A1D-A7D0-09469602CD8E@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 13:48:41 +0200
Cc: Pete Heist <pete@heistp.net>, TSVWG <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D2060A0D-BC02-4BEF-8F02-5F723A4F6F7A@gmail.com>
References: <161366419040.16138.17111583810851995947@ietfa.amsl.com> <BF0810D9-E742-4FCB-90B1-6957551B585D@heistp.net> <29EBB69A-2A00-4A1D-A7D0-09469602CD8E@ericsson.com>
To: Mirja Kuehlewind <mirja.kuehlewind=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/VMi5IK1UTX1IKNPS6hXLA1QbgnU>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-heist-tsvwg-ecn-deployment-observations-00.txt
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 11:48:48 -0000

> On 19 Feb, 2021, at 1:44 pm, Mirja Kuehlewind <mirja.kuehlewind=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> I have one question on the data. Maybe I'm not readying this correctly but if I look at the big table at the end, then I see a lot of cases where there are much more CE marks than ECT(0) marks. That's a bit unexpected as usually an AQM should only mark a small portion of the packets. Or do I interpret the data there incorrectly?

We believe that's evidence of the ECN field being used incorrectly by some UDP-based applications.  This is discussed in the draft and could be due to people putting values intended for the DSCP field (6 bits, left justified) or the obsolete Precedence-TOS fields (3+4 bits, left justified) directly into the TOS byte.

For that reason, we only count TCP and what are probably tunnelled TCP traffic as evidence of actual ECN and AQM deployment.

 - Jonathan Morton

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email