[tsvwg] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-ndata-12

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Mon, 14 August 2017 20:02 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietf.org
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3598313240F; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 13:02:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: tsvwg@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-ndata.all@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.58.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <150274094205.10409.17989486864216331116@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 13:02:22 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/VwqdURklVt5z9PZdEjSwLjMe2CU>
Subject: [tsvwg] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-ndata-12
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 20:02:22 -0000

Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review result: Ready

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-ndata-12
Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review Date: 2017-08-14
IETF LC End Date: 2017-08-25
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: This is a well written draft and is ready for publication.

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:

You repeat the text:

"A message is considered in flight, if at least  on of its I-DATA chunks is not
acknowledged in a non-renegable way"  in two consecutive sections, maybe a
common definition could be used.