Re: [tsvwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-sack-immediately-02: Concluded

Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> Mon, 08 April 2013 08:40 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 043D621F92EF for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 01:40:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m0U2Kri1em13 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 01:40:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.fh-muenster.de (mail.fh-muenster.de [193.174.88.235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50FFF21F915B for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 01:40:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.fh-muenster.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9291B34318; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 10:40:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.fh-muenster.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.fh-muenster.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x50siccJ-nFt; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 10:40:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.11.235.36] (unknown [10.11.235.36]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: tuexen) by mail.fh-muenster.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90E8C34313; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 10:40:17 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
In-Reply-To: <6acee7069222a68abf4560234ac8b2ac.squirrel@www.erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 10:40:19 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <5BF7EA96-B3B5-4FE2-BB79-9C41D4752A10@lurchi.franken.de>
References: <4F605902.40009@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <5148B330.3000304@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <CAO249ycs-1at532RQWHzJVpH49p-PyXX4Sh=e=DGTs7WqMKOzQ@mail.gmail.com> <A7378318-1AA0-4B8C-B2A6-DF45B7F5A63B@lurchi.franken.de> <267C7CD9-6E64-4133-B4B5-029DE6EA8847@ifi.uio.no> <E527DD3C-F037-442A-98FF-9CE61758E669@lurchi.franken.de> <31D96103-8E36-44C4-A131-03C79385775C@ifi.uio.no> <6D9CC3C2-538A-4ACA-BF27-F1E5CC51B0FF@lurchi.franken.de> <C91AD42F-BAA2-4DAA-A21A-D097D4D9F5F6@ifi.uio.no> <21058D18-3A54-4474-ABA5-A9F5DCE10F9C@lurchi.franken.de> <515E0FED.1070701@kau.se> <4D5E4983-3572-45FB-A247-22AFC1533AD2@lurchi.franken.de> <6acee7069222a68abf4560234ac8b2ac.squirrel@www.erg.abdn.ac.uk>
To: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
Cc: tsvwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-sack-immediately-02: Concluded
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 08:40:21 -0000

On Apr 8, 2013, at 8:41 AM, gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk wrote:

> This emails concludes the WGLC period.  There was consensus to proceed
> with publication (6 notes) of support) and no notes that suggested we
> should not publish.
> 
> During the WGLC various comments were contributed and questions raised -
> the authors should now use this list to work on updated text to fix these
> issues and submit a new draft with a summary of changes.
A new version has been submitted:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-sack-immediately

The differences can be view via
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-sack-immediately-03

Summary of changes:
* Grammar and spelling improvements.
* Text changes to improve clarity and readability.

So no technical changes were introduced.

Best regards
Michael
> 
> Best wishes,
> 
> Gorry
> (as TSVWG Co-Chair).
> 
>