Re: [tsvwg] Deprecating RFC 3168 for future ECN experimentation

Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> Wed, 31 March 2021 03:19 UTC

Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 812BE3A15A1 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 20:19:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.152
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, PDS_TONAME_EQ_TOLOCAL_SHORT=1.999, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cs2vXB8XoRjM for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 20:19:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x131.google.com (mail-lf1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 387993A15A3 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 20:19:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x131.google.com with SMTP id b4so26955776lfi.6 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 20:19:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Y9Z2PjNXKYIr9WDkSZfyJBW9WRJ2HatTmHpf6G2czzk=; b=YTvUSSi+BvF6MzR0rAHI8ljTNihHmRJx9ByvMjWkXR4lOhNqVcmnticohFT4LThCSK ZyCdTco/URqSO5aglXRbvedEcykbA2ITVFW2D9fEtujCSgDhKrw6TQou1/LOj4PgD2D9 h5XYXnbEeH1wflgHIbavRy5acBOsGdgZwyu59I0yCZyCnmeyDpIubOYIfEKL6AEYSAty eOSVv4k+kae/wDSeRvxfAZx5vxL/VzyY4g0WRc3aOhmx2zk8wWhT0qZM1wyeIqNO5VF3 OOzVyiL/h4mHUb/LB4kB2NGGauHZnkshfuZJQIcc+xJdqVcKYGYr76ZOI5pLIBINkftd n+6g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Y9Z2PjNXKYIr9WDkSZfyJBW9WRJ2HatTmHpf6G2czzk=; b=ecXMlUOqzQY5N4aLn6RI6EbsIK2jW2q5Kecoa6pRiMKGHUyAWL/CPUh3QOc2Z2BB8e b+C2Dri0pxyMcnVnZO6rfmISWmhVVy4BHqv4JQItXFwOFIBP3qzLUQfjXopEgXxmlc3w 11uyOX3bPqQ5iOt7yey0LrIrOg7ACOYoHaN6Gl4OAry/GmT7i9JBLTIPKk165qXAQcVv UJE5XWK5Ztj4uGouSgLz/VTaDzg7k3k69yHuY+INgb554zWNqzuFApJnwik+cukpjv4N /2ivyvDxQm/7fhGoaNNuPVXDnWXIcCwhJNyGdLwFV7amoNbM42/cO8weq+ewIFE8bnkf 9uLg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530FckGdD5lL8eAknbzsvp26FDAhhss4NQvTmhpL3ZGro92+q/VF xWPZSyIOQFlYqvLHB988YlizzCVDXvA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzpK7iMx8Vq9NIXwCbVwBNuL2CSsypbFtuDOcJtjyLkBBCYfsxTWHVVYsvId9c9mU4Gv8alCg==
X-Received: by 2002:a19:ee0d:: with SMTP id g13mr890927lfb.38.1617160744769; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 20:19:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jonathartonsmbp.lan (178-55-25-11.bb.dnainternet.fi. [178.55.25.11]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z129sm83318lfa.127.2021.03.30.20.19.03 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 30 Mar 2021 20:19:04 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.7\))
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5e7e7809cf294769b1184c10c61e707e@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 06:19:02 +0300
Cc: Steven Blake <slblake@petri-meat.com>, "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EE05CDD2-45CA-48F0-8284-C8258B10E88F@gmail.com>
References: <1b673100019174d056c44339d3b1758df058a2aa.camel@petri-meat.com> <5e7e7809cf294769b1184c10c61e707e@huawei.com>
To: daihuichen <daihuichen@huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/WK7XWome1-eftN41xMDSVs73Mrc>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Deprecating RFC 3168 for future ECN experimentation
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 03:19:12 -0000

> On 31 Mar, 2021, at 6:15 am, daihuichen <daihuichen@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
> Today, ECN has been widely deployed in data center networks…

May I ask, purely out of idle curiosity, whether those deployments are primarily of the single-queue variety, or of the flow-isolating type?

 - Jonathan Morton