Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i.e., stuck)

Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> Mon, 16 March 2020 21:42 UTC

Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55FAC3A11DE for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 14:42:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.848
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YQMO8xZPobJ2 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 14:42:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22e.google.com (mail-lj1-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38F273A11B7 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 14:42:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id r24so20502246ljd.4 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 14:42:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Xn3JP/m6fYnF8L/m2N1tSon9u3yCdbbI4RPMDpK3058=; b=kx3+BABCh4vHQkFlNzpn6scDVdKk7uqKFwt2/WkZcqpDcKETuF29/wDopMNu8d2kVh h7eUfpO2bcfDfEBW/HUTLCKrTtflsFAzygiH0p7qG3GLBK0eaVKtbyOoHJermbgv9ehn eubYDXKV8QvF2ceZLyerc459z5ISgD1HlF8Rs1J8OiiRQa0DmK9SzovheoDgO5S88vT2 bjGczvDJkA/BtU405aoz5x+dBsnr7Vdt+UvEgdNZQcD+ViU1Ll9relO/kfcCBLgKaQIX 7lIcsPDv7SgW4XaIYvVhdoggr9wMCo3etuaunfdydoYHCVuU+WNfm141gd7RdbTzlNxl XdZw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Xn3JP/m6fYnF8L/m2N1tSon9u3yCdbbI4RPMDpK3058=; b=It2oh3XRSoKF9ZQhjBcjMcIha+XuCn+t1BiYJLtmvPCeLoxZ3nGooCLNN5EMlVOLl0 xs9NC2AMEsySqlPiAsbO0571t5C+/Ouo5k6i/wJQ/Kj3dGCLKnkmGY8Y1uv+shhnKzcf B22Q7RYh0B3uAUmjJYFDIQ0ohUvouKM/y8ptD9Xs0q8tw7u/jp5zxBCYwYaZqqnanS80 UN5x88Aj65/cbQ/no54Zyyc5tXnHuO00I0IM5teRYmm+ctreV8Y+tRa8XmX8Oi8ocNkt 21WCfnQ97jnp9Bqz4nJihjBUF97C4jQtBB/r85HKMN+nsON9QGyrMp80rBFPbJWEUnyR pGXQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2dWqyUVH/ifKbpAWtUBDte9XB5k1Igc0/u5QzpwTQelTmQnT7v f6+YoLVJ9CuKUnOndLU2VsUb47J7
X-Google-Smtp-Source: =?utf-8?q?ADFU+vvInZqsHBZyIboLLWZhp2sKueqtjAR/zMjp+oyX?= =?utf-8?q?r/hjAYOOnL1TTGeLPE4CCaci0xTpf1UjdQ=3D=3D?=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:1b5:: with SMTP id c21mr808562ljn.174.1584394933547; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 14:42:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jonathartonsmbp.lan (83-245-250-250-nat-p.elisa-mobile.fi. [83.245.250.250]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b23sm774854lff.64.2020.03.16.14.42.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 16 Mar 2020 14:42:12 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <79DADF1F-4B33-4146-A75C-8B6E70614197@strayalpha.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 23:42:11 +0200
Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" <ietf@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>, "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FEC69B1D-5A71-4507-BA4C-A2FBC6DEDB8E@gmail.com>
References: <202003162130.02GLUBRv094638@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> <79DADF1F-4B33-4146-A75C-8B6E70614197@strayalpha.com>
To: Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/XOTtyeWzuWlja6DcPC-b9prHglo>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Status of ECN encapsulation drafts (i.e., stuck)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 21:42:16 -0000

> On 16 Mar, 2020, at 11:38 pm, Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> wrote:
> 
> That’s not always possible. If the net runs over minimal IPv6 links, there’s no way to ensure a traffic can support 1280B packets over 1280B tunnels.

I think the 1280B minimum was intended to allow for the possibility of running through tunnels on conventional 1500B physical networks.

 - Jonathan Morton