IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] RFC Number for draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960bis

Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com> Mon, 11 April 2022 23:16 UTC

Return-Path: <sginoza@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CFC53A0E05 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 16:16:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p4_sJpwnEESE for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 16:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6194B3A0E01 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 16:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CFA4427C642; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 16:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HPpiYRJsEGAG; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 16:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (2603-8000-9603-b513-28e1-2e61-2e6f-b4e8.res6.spectrum.com [IPv6:2603:8000:9603:b513:28e1:2e61:2e6f:b4e8]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1DE38425A344; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 16:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
From: Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAM4esxQOzOWWS8Z_tfSimsDDYXdY2x=5ERp0Mq-2HPq5UL4dog@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 16:16:02 -0700
Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>, tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <077790D6-F448-4DD9-AE4F-6B2F17B615F4@amsl.com>
References: <CAM4esxQOzOWWS8Z_tfSimsDDYXdY2x=5ERp0Mq-2HPq5UL4dog@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/XlS21ogy7g7Q2KItv7ospzFkwMA>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] RFC Number for draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960bis
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 23:16:09 -0000

Hi Martin,

We are unable to accommodate this request, as 9460 is a 200+ number jump from the range in which we are currently assigning.  It’s not ideal as it would take us 9 months to a year to close the gap. 

Thanks,
Sandy 


> On Apr 8, 2022, at 11:12 AM, Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello RFC Editor,
> 
> This document is the third in a series, succeeding RFCs 2960 and 4960.
> 
> Would it be possible to assign this document 9460?
> 
> Thanks
> Martin Duke
> TSV AD

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email