[tsvwg] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-33.txt

"touch@strayalpha.com" <touch@strayalpha.com> Wed, 11 September 2024 23:18 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1E6EC14EB19 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2024 16:18:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tjTej-MfKASs for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2024 16:18:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-3.web-hosting.com (server217-3.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.226]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D07E9C14F6BC for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2024 16:18:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Fy/sb6/j0pbgeJsakXixr8U2MACbaS0N3q7zVYkh2ZE=; b=n7wLjMvkvSmP/26RQtAo6Nv7JE zBubK4Hlc1c5o7So+SI85rqrDnA1hlcpDTH3HLqI6z6S09WzbTsQb/CHRIwanOBnWOFchkkdX3feM 1czg/LGyNq4S5L7omaqoSEDXv4TOmKJwnbRQknPQ6oLOAlMipP9RKblFYaVGncbG7jp8/+xhozGVh JSba+hEBUEJgmOaQTWywTSYE64C2KrTv9cy9NCHEqGJcU2wLhYkW65QQz0BSses+N1U1F0D8k6aZk d0i+P8K94TpH6wV1kjUrj+usvxRM5Lmr7ZXRioA6Lt0m3F5U0IIR4yisGUoP3j9ZFEvu3LhENI1vI hW/+q3Lg==;
Received: from [172.58.208.157] (port=25222 helo=smtpclient.apple) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96.2) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1soWbK-00AILV-26; Wed, 11 Sep 2024 19:18:16 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_85B640DC-6396-447B-8CE4-5FAD71E8CE00"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3776.700.51\))
From: "touch@strayalpha.com" <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALx6S34o-=qCR7UtjUKcDwsQB5T3jvF3j0PPW+6GDSGPE7LT1w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 16:18:04 -0700
Message-Id: <D0E818D9-CAA4-4256-8F89-22A69358D5CF@strayalpha.com>
References: <CALx6S37QJ77TAZKf06-jSaTLOiP5OeSYb6jFOikBTd+HeqYuJw@mail.gmail.com> <5898CEC4-9BE0-4C01-B32F-7CEAC3C2EB3D@strayalpha.com> <CALx6S37hJ7-08Ti_ZFg-z8cEaxu3n7GXJ98waE7-6wYxL0HU+A@mail.gmail.com> <4ED642F2-B29C-48BC-B1B7-A0B2E1F9164D@strayalpha.com> <CALx6S34VYR7BR0KveLaMMaZbbixw-qP1Mu-N3PhzevV54bOZQA@mail.gmail.com> <66193785-0089-48B8-B3C9-0F153B8C2773@strayalpha.com> <CALx6S34o-=qCR7UtjUKcDwsQB5T3jvF3j0PPW+6GDSGPE7LT1w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tom Herbert <tom=40herbertland.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3776.700.51)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Message-ID-Hash: MVIDUH4SUZSBWC77SWUKIFC4QYASAB5U
X-Message-ID-Hash: MVIDUH4SUZSBWC77SWUKIFC4QYASAB5U
X-MailFrom: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tsvwg.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, tsvwg IETF list <tsvwg@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [tsvwg] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-33.txt
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/YkvhRtkYFtpVfJH9RITcUfwchm8>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tsvwg-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tsvwg-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tsvwg-leave@ietf.org>

> On Sep 11, 2024, at 3:59 PM, Tom Herbert <tom=40herbertland.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Joe,
> 
> You seem to be the only person arguing for best effort authentication.
> Is there any one else on the list who supports that?

This isn’t best effort.

The DEFAULT is “receiver prerogative” and if a receiver has a key - or decides it won’t accept packets without authentication - it can override the default. It can also check later, rather than only upon receipt.

Most of the arguments you have offered so far against this misrepresent the *default* as the only choice or the choice a receiver who has a key would necessarily make and must be made at the time of receipt. That’s not what the current doc says at all.

So far, I’ve heard others concerned about wanting to be able to have UDP drop packets with AUTH that either fails or cannot be checked. But again, that’s not what we’re talking about.

Joe