[tsvwg] [Errata Verified] RFC9435 (8081)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 20 August 2024 16:14 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietf.org
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from rfcpa.rfc-editor.org (unknown [167.172.21.234]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68855C1D5C57; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 09:14:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 461) id C7D7F7FA60; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 09:14:34 -0700 (PDT)
To: angelos2225@hotmail.com, ana@erg.abdn.ac.uk, gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk, r.secchi@abdn.ac.uk
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240820161434.C7D7F7FA60@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 09:14:34 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: UZ5YGVXPZEBISJFFC3RSVIAXXXXXZQLJ
X-Message-ID-Hash: UZ5YGVXPZEBISJFFC3RSVIAXXXXXZQLJ
X-MailFrom: wwwrun@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tsvwg.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: rfc-ed@rfc-editor.org, iesg@ietf.org, tsvwg@ietf.org, iana@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [tsvwg] [Errata Verified] RFC9435 (8081)
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/ZKCRP4pZ__ib-1Jv4G3GD27dbY8>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tsvwg-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tsvwg-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tsvwg-leave@ietf.org>
The following errata report has been verified for RFC9435, "Considerations for Assigning a New Recommended Differentiated Services Code Point (DSCP)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8081 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Editorial Reported by: Angelos Vassiliou <angelos2225@hotmail.com> Date Reported: 2024-08-17 Verified by: RFC Editor Section: 1 Original Text ------------- A common set of DSCPs are defined for both IPv4 and IPv6 Corrected Text -------------- A common set of DSCPs is defined for both IPv4 and IPv6 Notes ----- The subject of the sentence ("A common set") is singular, but the verb is plural. -------------------------------------- RFC9435 (draft-ietf-tsvwg-dscp-considerations-13) -------------------------------------- Title : Considerations for Assigning a New Recommended Differentiated Services Code Point (DSCP) Publication Date : July 2023 Author(s) : A. Custura, G. Fairhurst, R. Secchi Category : INFORMATIONAL Source : Transport and Services Working Group Stream : IETF
- [tsvwg] [Errata Verified] RFC9435 (8081) RFC Errata System