IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] L4S DSCP (was: L4S drafts: Next Steps)

Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Wed, 31 March 2021 13:18 UTC

Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 020773A2840 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 06:18:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J97ywicnksYs for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 06:18:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72e.google.com (mail-qk1-x72e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D7F93A283C for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 06:18:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72e.google.com with SMTP id 7so19233517qka.7 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 06:18:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=FQLN90xmgWgZX74mH/k7R7yAsz15kIHz5eyY4UgY/WY=; b=UzLrD8KlStXlVeTyumOsk8vYknnUUB23D5Ch0sSt7RkQSNqaVSQvwlA3rKLFvzvcIr LpSu3MfgqISZSd4kIy1pubSGtAZYgw7hXFCQfq145DPOs95QQPF2lzsCHSPirpRqwjwx LZJw7cKBQ0SBvbqX/MjcloaheAZTAET6E6bsnqvyEaeBAXYomZ4cbs5Y2u2Y/XnEWphr DZjMov/XU9iPAJbB2ICl4Y3H/w0qapBjp0zT+xJadJVoyVEjW9ewvKx7x6aWvhO8jJ9j a8P7EyZq4nJ6nHP1c/auvvfHyFE/FAQG38N7D6pLTQ9sK1LkAgh5rBI6NG0yRkN+Ocll Jdfg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=FQLN90xmgWgZX74mH/k7R7yAsz15kIHz5eyY4UgY/WY=; b=YEMmlTgQvsPyEgw6M7VfAxbvTAdhMK9qbBLdFsF30p4Ugn7DOHgVh4kx8f9pK1yDeJ hHIyds9ifA1ncWZM6EuMcqonsE0b2Mn1ILX+6xxoWrKX23YPsPYgepWFaYV5UgHKkqgk J8skAsNtxLPPtluOghtv/mkVYkKk3x/6oSVVvZIgoVy2tYSF9vKdQcBAUJB9TFj5fRtq QDRAw1iyNvN+nWMpc7UqKtLYbrR2h9Rqtr/f4CSYLku/1uGtcoFZEPRrrJXF8L/8gxvW JlZVwebe221C8O7rWU81Ee86lL/8sovIW9Y8HqB+w5ksrl4TLaiv7yheRyWIDV/wbPzK 8V5Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533K3qC5i2l7M5uGSipZKgXwHL6qQoIgKpubEE3h8nkJ0K1ikbxo DkcGJbLS009HfJA3C4EW/hZogWn70JmTdhj0
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx9y2/7oTfB0v+7gNKGUuleiW+mINlkdBVo81ZRwfy4NCr/vvePHsr5dqQd5KJZ3nI9GqBm9A==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:dcb:: with SMTP id 194mr3187537qkn.4.1617196677449; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 06:17:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.114] (rrcs-69-135-1-122.central.biz.rr.com. [69.135.1.122]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r8sm1337700qtu.49.2021.03.31.06.17.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 31 Mar 2021 06:17:56 -0700 (PDT)
To: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Cc: tsvwg@ietf.org
References: <MN2PR19MB404527384A1B1DD9CFC2A3D983659@MN2PR19MB4045.namprd19.prod.outlook.com> <6f0ac4bf-bd1a-65cd-1d40-a97d4aa71aab@bobbriscoe.net> <7B4426F9-E1C5-4F88-A264-0D54C809D523@gmail.com> <d28a8ac1-83a3-d7b5-3106-80abdca8b5a7@bobbriscoe.net> <C05137C5-B972-4E8F-8B1A-3254A4BB9865@gmail.com> <fe9b72cc-62fa-1587-64b4-4ed8b0b32d5a@bobbriscoe.net> <712A4EA0-27AE-4037-9ED2-687A5A69689B@gmail.com> <55df6d38-9b6e-aa31-7731-35765675d8de@bobbriscoe.net> <97DD093D-3FF4-45BF-9881-160763BF13FF@gmail.com> <b136740c-b413-ab20-615e-5476d207feb2@mti-systems.com> <E3A1A07F-4F26-410D-B7A8-E80B714F032F@gmail.com>
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Message-ID: <3f49483f-6ce9-9df2-436c-80e22d9a98bf@mti-systems.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 09:17:55 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <E3A1A07F-4F26-410D-B7A8-E80B714F032F@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------3D7DED3F9FDA9BC7707077B3"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/ZV-20J4h-2tX5c2lgCmGr0jGaho>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] L4S DSCP (was: L4S drafts: Next Steps)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 13:18:12 -0000

On 3/30/2021 10:48 PM, Jonathan Morton wrote:
>> On 31 Mar, 2021, at 2:12 am, Wesley Eddy<wes@mti-systems.com>  wrote:
>>
>>> Okay, so what mechanism do you propose to contain the L4S experiment to the participating networks?
>> I think the notion of a strong containment guarantee to participating networks that you mention is a bit extreme in contrast to just reducing the likelihood or severity of issues.
> Certainly I would prefer to see the underlying problems fixed, rather than adding safety barriers around the edges. Does that open the door to SCE-type signalling?  If not, why not?

I have not seen indication that the mass of people working on this are supportive of this type of change.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email