IETF Logo Mail Archive

[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] The TSVWG WG has placed draft-duke-tsvwg-udp-ecn in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de> Wed, 13 November 2024 14:16 UTC

Return-Path: <moeller0@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EBA6C15106A; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 06:16:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.853
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.853 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmx.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WQzc4T9uge2B; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 06:16:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86A9BC14F61A; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 06:16:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmx.de; s=s31663417; t=1731507400; x=1732112200; i=moeller0@gmx.de; bh=D2gN3yKRGT5BOZPlH0gJmCzkrtpTrh63o381BJp7ICs=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From: In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id: References:To:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from: message-id:mime-version:reply-to:subject:to; b=spPsnyT6tIhJhS3Sh6dTZ9vvVR+FNXN8Yu7DBUmWf+ewY8iJDa0JA7VA9+KpAdaG 86hcjTalwVEOBCvVzO0ts4lvB9lU1mfp0KIMvlllWFKutNd/btdiugeYumGaz9YI6 JQhhDA663YsGztbc5g9eRdhS5FX4l55AIzija3CZqmvuWj1Z7S4p0W0avRRDKISDN f0KuobZj0Briw0OztUD0DmqjwKvbUNdU3rpZQKowvd1fcH+G0ypoKsumM4YYPHScW E17wA9Z3uppCAkThD9u4caARWpJJ2LBQ081OQEsS8qqmL6SksVrvgiI0b8dEHMTQB BYiNGbeFtZyg9qYKuQ==
X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([134.76.241.253]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MGz1f-1synzH3Cfj-00G0I5; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 15:16:40 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3776.700.51.11.1\))
From: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <LV2PR01MB7622ED46CADEC0FF33BA3F8C9F5A2@LV2PR01MB7622.prod.exchangelabs.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 15:16:30 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <28A1C0F3-98E2-4424-9655-8436AC90565B@gmx.de>
References: <173148464207.923779.3507890029384718298@dt-datatracker-5f77bcf4bd-4q5pd> <LV2PR01MB7622ED46CADEC0FF33BA3F8C9F5A2@LV2PR01MB7622.prod.exchangelabs.com>
To: "Overcash, Michael (CCI-Atlanta)" <michael.overcash=40cox.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3776.700.51.11.1)
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:fd/bfv13uEZgAyWSS2wax4th03LWDvyaR58lhNIihP1EH4t9LJt 1HqrQO9yfpBqK+GMOzyVGaoGyc88MQsElBXAIe4Bigmxu836LT6J636UKqAYQ7iQhW8HZOu yBZHm6vbt3i4u5nlN7rl4D/a6m4EN4DPBXx8KAvXe1UkR7LDLu6lmmCCNCowBmsOBaHkzAG NyVW+z7S7uNOE9l7WR2RA==
UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:Wu6PwiX8Lvk=;7YCST62wq54/eRjjTLno+Iu5Fl8 l+zaVaN/jewOA7Mi0AJTf8dwHXRjsIvl8x7DRzWMm7dsPkXggoctMfujUsvBGrsfHI1+1kL+v ltMn+3Jw2dAkWBiUZRW+wlrTjRnFdKJx6dt6c3CAxXnT5EI36F2L0WI/CWyF+1FaE4S5vHy43 ygGyxi+9DWdOYDR1SChb/e4CrWjw6nik9GdHzsrb8EQx22KTBvPLfxPoIGUIhCjo0ztWP1C92 rSyvq1du3h715xhf74DlzP5AzK7/fFpvvVCUXROIXhP/0DOyVAZCol4M9ulYPQt5IGqLptjgW wzKUBYNOekLhmoP0QJc6DX8PVmm2A4UgkzuteBds/h8dkz8vTpzRf/5Z3r36bO8xGMKx1myMw /N+3f5nyW8wYbOvO4s2o8Omgpco1hAELTtLeKlq65XcEATxvWqAiauaBLhJwS1iEse8P3vXCA BFbHuBJAQCkwknmGnh3faTwmOQ+n4dWoDW0ibTq8jjORLc7FbJvo+Ne72nneTDyZjETu3AgIC 0hpvBdR86353NRuKKLyfoBdKFyzY3PSavD6Vj9mCOcGlrPRkQS5WxogKjRVKbQDLS+zJWY7W+ xSpwvhfDF9k97AWOSdGQ4ItS7tpQv5F7sF1idv1i7We+kgoCPJWtl54rzvI89MCOxyXBtQJ3y YU1I8Ts3MAfEhu3phW7Czqi9BUPguZmWoaVaPMAEbGuAdq+kE6suNWEdD+tNirAW13Dk6Ri9w DuUfwhEywGEds/RTzubAx3aOQ4gD6ct38SYY0a0ktvVXX4s7QMk1QxWV6+0UY43aTHdIP+btc vbGEVpD94/WJGPGTyA0f8NeIjOM7c2XuqqkL4u0/rbHrjjV4UFA7td9ouJLxsFXaySXoeuFWg ZUJHOwEOfAsKtAGiVdJggt1CqkmBRn+1NmVP+1SGncCWnPZiwQSJgpbYJ
Message-ID-Hash: BL7IN2SLDA25ND7JW4VCH3IQG6ZRDN7S
X-Message-ID-Hash: BL7IN2SLDA25ND7JW4VCH3IQG6ZRDN7S
X-MailFrom: moeller0@gmx.de
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tsvwg.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>, "draft-duke-tsvwg-udp-ecn@ietf.org" <draft-duke-tsvwg-udp-ecn@ietf.org>, "tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org" <tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org>, "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] The TSVWG WG has placed draft-duke-tsvwg-udp-ecn in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/_TfPTHwEE02bMvfdMj1snmHBNGg>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tsvwg-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tsvwg-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tsvwg-leave@ietf.org>

Confused, the draft only mentions DSCPs in passing (two occurrences)?

> On 13. Nov 2024, at 15:08, Overcash, Michael (CCI-Atlanta) <michael.overcash=40cox.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> I support adoption of this draft. Up until recently, setting DSCP values was rarely done and so this documentation is very practical and helpful.
> 
> --
> Michael Overcash
> Principal Architect, CPE Premises Engineering
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2024 2:57 AM
> To: draft-duke-tsvwg-udp-ecn@ietf.org; tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org; tsvwg@ietf.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [tsvwg] The TSVWG WG has placed draft-duke-tsvwg-udp-ecn in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
> 
> 
> The TSVWG WG has placed draft-duke-tsvwg-udp-ecn in state
> Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Gorry Fairhurst)
> 
> The document is available at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-duke-tsvwg-udp-ecn/
> 
> Comment:
> Hello TSV WG,
> 
> This is a formal adoption call that will run 2 weeks, ending on 29th
> November 2024. Please respond to this email thread with any comments
> indicating support or objection to adopting this draft as a basis for
> work on ECN support for UDP.
> 
> During IETF-121, the WG discussed "Configuring UDP Sockets for ECN for
> Common Platforms" (draft-duke-tsvwg-udp-ecn)  and the sense in the room
> indicated some support for adoption, this email provides an opportunity
> to contribute comments on this planned work.
> 
> Best wishes,
> Gorry and Marten
> (tsvwg co-chairs)
>

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status