Re: [tsvwg] Your NQB presentation
Greg White <g.white@CableLabs.com> Fri, 22 November 2019 01:29 UTC
Return-Path: <g.white@CableLabs.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91F6A120115 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 17:29:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cablelabs.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oKY2Zc4ZRKGD for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 17:29:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NAM05-DM3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm3nam05on0710.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe51::710]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FC731200A3 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 17:29:48 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=khXQuuw2vmVfQjm+auwiTfrwwKLrfHBT6mA/UYkktUYCBohxJWe92DICB+cWVDZc9Mc3ME4ZF7oEX7uxt9t08I3IrKhouwLmBkhkA4Uq6zv7g3mrHK9Oa9Mmj3r1L+TOTWRahPC+9pt4z0OJOsexg4kqpvTPjbjApOnfrTyVQcHMLZQ1B4nVzolnBe+tS13z4P9P9V9tTR1YA8l/WW3cG4jDTVQ+MKbcr8a4/q+PI45qiaeaD29t+6o02+tNA1i84z9doAOlzznz9IOk6JdrQRpw1dWYCM5UzFWRjYmPwo/2Hson3tTXQmnphwhNDL9i6jGhOyQZ4lJD0WwL6ReHdQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=HDB37ja3vNXTfcrKIVC4T1WrByndq4daMvcUYYuSGjA=; b=U07mIc208ojFfDSYyZst4D8TdToBjChWp54XErh6Xv0mN0Z0xpFgD7Yx97QtRE1W1f/lgVA0Pmt1vLDKZqxYrNuQDQRNSCRqnn0zzbp8jXdhO2mq2viryQK5viSTXw5sWSGYQt/zohw1Ipe60MAJ1/V5/AgIEMFe7z9zdbnAqCmY5lVGHmo4JpwTI6B2otSYvmJSL52CUznfFdGw+TfC0Z9GWnLj1PTRmuzWDYldVXvzhIXLn6jSNIx5W3osFTQ3HKCPYILlwovn+C8BlOGvpjMJ0KIlzfJdXR1QCGipa2Th/mgUlfBHGuPakmUfn4RDs+D+6DC15TruKv6YGyqiyA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cablelabs.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cablelabs.com; dkim=pass header.d=cablelabs.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cablelabs.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=HDB37ja3vNXTfcrKIVC4T1WrByndq4daMvcUYYuSGjA=; b=Z3UPnSs5+KIKgB3S7ZFSuQfp1UmOhtlUP+0wZOVAPRgP2U9L8nXwWnpSnxw1j8QZ/VDuDkzFPmxzVTwp4lD5VfYbgd9xaZ9vtfBEtXuX8AEqzLr8Ym7ZAAmchh9WVKd5BweMRFQUWBPMNQAnyCQ4uEaVUQTkTChOxsClDIiYO9Q=
Received: from SN6PR06MB4655.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (52.135.117.85) by SN6PR06MB3837.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (52.135.65.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2474.19; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 01:29:43 +0000
Received: from SN6PR06MB4655.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::91c5:f29b:4501:6db5]) by SN6PR06MB4655.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::91c5:f29b:4501:6db5%2]) with mapi id 15.20.2474.019; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 01:29:43 +0000
From: Greg White <g.white@CableLabs.com>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>, tsvwg IETF list <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Your NQB presentation
Thread-Index: AQHVoLB3iP6D1SELaUyg7aQ/dA7umaeW7VwA
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 01:29:43 +0000
Message-ID: <490F228F-57B3-430F-ABC8-38350E44EAC7@cablelabs.com>
References: <B654E9D3-A5E2-45AC-A4D3-E86757263CFB@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <B654E9D3-A5E2-45AC-A4D3-E86757263CFB@gmx.de>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1c.0.190812
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=g.white@CableLabs.com;
x-originating-ip: [203.127.152.4]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: c6c3fc59-b06e-4752-d618-08d76eeb73e5
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SN6PR06MB3837:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <SN6PR06MB383713C8DB6E18FB531E0BD2EE490@SN6PR06MB3837.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8273;
x-forefront-prvs: 02296943FF
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(396003)(346002)(366004)(376002)(136003)(39850400004)(189003)(199004)(51444003)(11346002)(14454004)(76116006)(91956017)(66446008)(64756008)(66556008)(66476007)(66946007)(6246003)(71200400001)(71190400001)(2616005)(478600001)(256004)(25786009)(66066001)(99286004)(110136005)(86362001)(58126008)(316002)(561944003)(33656002)(102836004)(186003)(76176011)(26005)(36756003)(6506007)(2906002)(3480700005)(3846002)(6116002)(446003)(6486002)(229853002)(81156014)(81166006)(8676002)(305945005)(6512007)(6436002)(7116003)(5660300002)(7736002)(8936002)(85282002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:SN6PR06MB3837; H:SN6PR06MB4655.namprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: CableLabs.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 3Cq8GF4K9vpL2ShG3CeyPYIaqbJGmfHCntV9+TOM4UXm+Jgkd+RWkE5l74aDyWJZIws/91pIM3fYlNziM+Sx+Zka7AGrofJr9B2KBvFPgkA0VeaqwAKwRI6ylpCSjrsyk9MuqkuG1Y5VCPa+ehMr0duD3IeeHmWG+IaO1uzXeV19FDn8ETWbPGAqnfUGFogw64d6V/E1Kgov4r0CgLVP7cR9n9mPASsYC7/9dRRdRycwRCOOubbVldLFne/TRqkBKfXNjajWz+y8FwVpkXBZufqfPfonMzFwBmcYSLLU6HAxLhEN5drJJBb+hlQDgzKoFNCcsmgU8L5MzscvfMGNcGnH3S70JIS4ohllULoWrxKVTn1ARKvLvChYzdy5Htj7tBQIWLYFqKRfCuI3XCKx0drsmG4kHB3gIoGpVUE2n+S11DSH5E5k8BG/ZawHdz5x
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <9BE9968C41C39549AE5D3A0251CF2459@namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: cablelabs.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: c6c3fc59-b06e-4752-d618-08d76eeb73e5
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 22 Nov 2019 01:29:43.5077 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: ce4fbcd1-1d81-4af0-ad0b-2998c441e160
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: Hg136Mkv2xPC3RFHNZv27Tg1/0FVqsuk5FzaIBHKMpXQ3+EDvXvFOmY6wEDyHstZVzIBIO+LSD/8MJa+58/H3w==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN6PR06MB3837
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/atzD4-2YE3SWq4__NIuELq4pO1I>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Your NQB presentation
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 01:29:51 -0000
Sebastian, all, I had a discussion with David Black on the subject of DSCP and he proposed a resolution that perhaps addresses the main concerns that have been expressed. The proposal (David, feel free to jump in if I've misstated anything) is to select the 0x2A code point, and add two requirements to address the WiFi safety concern: An ISP node that supports the NQB PHB and serves residential users MUST have the ability to re-mark NQB traffic as default, and MUST do so by default. (precise wording to be smithed) I think that this achieves the same end result as selecting a low-valued code point - it ensures that operators will need to actively decide to pass the 0x2A codepoint through to their residential customers. In addition to these two MUSTs, we need some clear and concise informative text that discusses the WMM safety concern. I think we share the belief that the vast majority (all?) residential ISPs currently bleach ALL DSCPs to default for their residential customers, and so the 0x2A value will already be handled in the same manner, but these requirements and the (to be written) informative text will help ensure operators only deviate from that default state consciously. -Greg On 11/22/19, 5:13 AM, "Sebastian Moeller" <moeller0@gmx.de> wrote: Dear Greg, dear list, I just had the opportunity to watch the video of your presentation. Just a quick note that I very much appreciated the balanced, concise and unbiased presentation of the PHB and the open issues. Regarding code points, I had proposed 0x2E since it is the "sum" of 0x6 and CS5, so I saw a cute "symmetry" there, but since it is is taken already (and I agree the goal should be for NQB to be ideally unambiguous end to end) I am fine with 0x2A for the case when AC_VI is known to be safe to use. Best Regards Sebastian
- [tsvwg] Your NQB presentation Sebastian Moeller
- Re: [tsvwg] Your NQB presentation Greg White
- Re: [tsvwg] Your NQB presentation Black, David
- Re: [tsvwg] Your NQB presentation Michael Welzl
- Re: [tsvwg] Your NQB presentation Greg White
- Re: [tsvwg] Your NQB presentation Michael Welzl
- Re: [tsvwg] Your NQB presentation Sebastian Moeller
- Re: [tsvwg] Your NQB presentation Black, David
- Re: [tsvwg] Your NQB presentation Sebastian Moeller