Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1)

"Flinck, Hannu (Nokia - FI/Espoo)" <hannu.flinck@nokia-bell-labs.com> Fri, 15 May 2020 05:45 UTC

Return-Path: <hannu.flinck@nokia-bell-labs.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E2C23A0978 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 May 2020 22:45:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.073
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.073 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.173, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q5vXuK3G86I8 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 May 2020 22:45:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR05-DB8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-db8eur05on2133.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.20.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED9503A0977 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 May 2020 22:45:45 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=PCStvthwA/gvFYy/6/7MAKg24lYcrlZcPrPy4xzGG2SQq3YaaqxPtFZ7O8ZZdbqf3ptKo0dhVfcBwSyQvP5p+OvlrQUqdYU+AlnHsfU9cEjw1q/7Vr4nFumTg/+9XZyW/H22L0KHOs24o0FosnQ9UQeieUYxKjoxPnNtx/fVMegKhyimbYw4CV1iBAziN36Y1z4GgsffZ68bax1hVU3ToF8kiGrIasJRYM5gQoifafLFg4Dz67yqit10sHkexQErJ5i367Rp+7dWt5zCdJtDJSVvr9w2msEQPcOEo6umTmmP52hgpT8rziX1rLfrB5xve5D8qCkZbhTS51zNr2n/9Q==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=rAMXyKm7SqQVYRiLUTfXAd5E1ZgcMrVsIeEq1z5QEG4=; b=KfPcrddt1ruOCXYkAB1ljSNZPFQWcMdhwZjCKbqKcIgL2mkhiGG4CVV5jejgpPd6EIBkN6T6fDlieG9OnvKU1dWZjTENYvoqQ1fc+32AVIJl6X5VnXbcPwzIIm2B7BXXYAvX+U2gg6RGe59v+PZQBXyAhKsrswl01lcdmyUNfFBJCSLDH0M3wZ9eNsNWYIkSMWl++vrAVbaCujXYZC8HJQyU54GwFMRc1y8BQHKCi2dK9Dy8wdHpmgOPQnAB6yx0OIlXaI5IW/RasytqQRmKTpnZLayABUAwsXJsR5xz4gqSqFgSSFiB6G5nJEpxX73SicjZPh425yz7gvzH1OZ6nQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nokia-bell-labs.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nokia-bell-labs.com; dkim=pass header.d=nokia-bell-labs.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-nokia-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=rAMXyKm7SqQVYRiLUTfXAd5E1ZgcMrVsIeEq1z5QEG4=; b=Cw4SEvyrnVUf4oRXOjo54dyOqf0n6QtpnpdfzRqO589mFEdYTZu8ECQraarcFvgYKnfgD1O6pEszWvwgFf9KJ2A1qs/6nDQmlFRX1+qWUEUXhaVI5VUqWvymnmbgxpMHNGbbOssjS/n6ucnBvhPUaGeBDFl3s+93v2z6585ToC4=
Received: from HE1PR0701MB2490.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:3:6d::18) by HE1PR0701MB2156.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:3:2b::17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3000.15; Fri, 15 May 2020 05:45:43 +0000
Received: from HE1PR0701MB2490.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::1017:b17f:1d70:74d8]) by HE1PR0701MB2490.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::1017:b17f:1d70:74d8%12]) with mapi id 15.20.3021.013; Fri, 15 May 2020 05:45:43 +0000
From: "Flinck, Hannu (Nokia - FI/Espoo)" <hannu.flinck@nokia-bell-labs.com>
To: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1)
Thread-Index: AQHWKnwQp2qzR0gewUuctxiH1+qd2Q==
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 05:45:43 +0000
Message-ID: <HE1PR0701MB2490C06F241F073F2CC19FE09BBD0@HE1PR0701MB2490.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <46720ce0-ffcb-e97f-3e2d-6b5274b73b15@mti-systems.com>
In-Reply-To: <46720ce0-ffcb-e97f-3e2d-6b5274b73b15@mti-systems.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=nokia-bell-labs.com;
x-originating-ip: [37.219.51.252]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 8f02bd34-66d1-46e4-67b8-08d7f8933590
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: HE1PR0701MB2156:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <HE1PR0701MB2156370AFEE196563FB9B7379BBD0@HE1PR0701MB2156.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 04041A2886
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:HE1PR0701MB2490.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(346002)(396003)(136003)(39860400002)(376002)(366004)(316002)(8676002)(5660300002)(71200400001)(2906002)(7696005)(66946007)(76116006)(9686003)(186003)(66446008)(66556008)(53546011)(66476007)(64756008)(6506007)(52536014)(6916009)(55016002)(33656002)(166002)(478600001)(26005)(86362001)(66574014)(8936002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_HE1PR0701MB2490C06F241F073F2CC19FE09BBD0HE1PR0701MB2490_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: nokia-bell-labs.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 8f02bd34-66d1-46e4-67b8-08d7f8933590
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 15 May 2020 05:45:43.7432 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5d471751-9675-428d-917b-70f44f9630b0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: wgsIAJysarz7sVVf0bmInRgDx0odhKjcMtLij6MyL8Szz8HeeE+Vllu0xztbWjalh+4zTpr04q+PFC4eiMby/TZO2b+hmEmI9q7piKvFI1hIuKHOab6U2Ec1LqNdMTxH
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HE1PR0701MB2156
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/4WZPD_UdVrddbPgWyNrryIq57_g>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 05:45:50 -0000

I support using ECT(1) as an input signal to the network.

Best regards
Hannu

From: tsvwg <tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Wesley Eddy
Sent: Monday, May 4, 2020 9:15 PM
To: tsvwg@ietf.org
Subject: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1)


In this email thread, please state, concisely, which of the following viewpoints on ECT(1) you prefer. Please have extended discussion in a different thread. If you are uncomfortable sharing your opinion on the list, you may email the tsvwg chairs directly (tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org>).


If you did not attend the 27 April interim, please watch the meeting video [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dw3YKyeFxQU] for context on this question.


  1.  I support using ECT(1) as an input signal to the network. This is the approach consistent with the current L4S drafts. This position does not mean that there are no remaining issues with L4S, but that the remaining issues can be resolved by continued WG effort on the current drafts.
  2.  I support using ECT(1) as an output signal from the network. This is consistent with SCE. If you believe L4S will not be safe for the internet without significant architectural changes, you are in this group.
  3.  There is a specific test or tests I need to see before making a decision about ECT(1). Please be specific about the tests in your response.


Please submit your opinion by 5/18/2020.