Re: [tsvwg] Reminder: Advancing MP-DCCP towards a working group last call : Intended publication status

[Gorry Fairhurst <[e-mail]>]

On 01/11/2022 15:36, [e-mail] wrote:
>
> Dear Gorry, all,
>
> after we have seen feedback from Xiaomi, BT and Vodafone who are in 
> favour of PS, I formally request as one of the MP-DCCP draft authors 
> to consider the move from EXP to PS.
>
> The authors of the MP-DCCP draft sharing your view Gorry and the one 
> from Tengmingxuan (Xiaomi), that MP-DCCP is close to existing MP 
> efforts in IETF like MPTCP and MP-QUIC, which both follow PS track.
>
> We further know that Tengmingxuan and BT have experience in 
> implementing MP-DCCP and MPTCP, which further strengthens their 
> support for PS.
>
> That’s why we don’t see any reason to stay with EXP.
>
> Br
>
> Markus
>
This topic will be discussed at IETF-115, and thanks again this is 
helpful input,

best wishes,

Gorry Fairhurst

TSVWG Chair


> *From:*tsvwg <[e-mail]> *On Behalf Of *Gorry Fairhurst
> *Sent:* Donnerstag, 13. Oktober 2022 11:55
> *To:* [e-mail]
> *Cc:* [e-mail]
> *Subject:* [tsvwg] Reminder: Advancing MP-DCCP towards a working group 
> last call : Intended publication status
>
> We'd like to close this topic at the next meeting.
>
> If you would like to express thoughts on what experimental work would 
> be needed if draft-ietf-tsvwg-multipath-dccp were too be published as 
> an EXP spec rather than a Proposed Standard, please do so either 
> on-list or privately to the chairs (at [e-mail] 
> <[e-mail]> <mailto:[e-mail]>).
>
> Best wishes
> Gorry, David and Marten
> (TSV WG Co-Chairs)
>
> On 28/09/2022 10:26, Gorry Fairhurst wrote:
>
>     TSVWG,
>
>         When MP-DCCP was adopted in 2021, it proposed publication was
>     EXP,
>
>         based on this needing experience to complete the design. This work
>         item has now progressed in TSVWG and seems to be approaching a
>     WGLC.
>
>         The IETF has completed related work on multipath protocol
>     extensions for
>         TCP (published in 2020 as PS in RFC8824), and more recently
>     new work was
>         adopted in the QUIC WG on multipath (which currently also
>     targets PS).
>         Bearing this in mind, and the additional implementation
>     feedback from
>         developing MP-DCCP, the chairs would welcome thoughts on what
>         experimental work would still be needed - and whether this ID
>     should
>         target EXP or PS for publication.
>
>     Notes on this topic will help the chairs to prepare for the 
>     anticpated WG last call of the MP-DCCP Spec.
>
>     Best wishes,
>
>     Gorry, David and Marten
>
>     (TSV WG Co-Chairs)
>