Re: [tsvwg] TSVWG WGLC: draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-08, closes 23 October 2019

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Tue, 05 November 2019 02:35 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59BB7120033 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 18:35:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5avXvpoo4c8m for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 18:35:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x136.google.com (mail-lf1-x136.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A63C12006B for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 18:35:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x136.google.com with SMTP id a6so10435815lfo.3 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 04 Nov 2019 18:35:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6CtuZCErZWIlvQlP8U6/r+0Lss1CXFNRNhLUvq7R2Ic=; b=v0xuM26HjUUO6khZ657q+fbTvZTtG6aDQPn1Mh5XoW49sv1BjcmLL99ZpsLq72uX0t S2CctrWm1OHMs7VbZmymFdy+y0RfE3RnpGBO9QAqfrl8wzG2L0p+C18gBneffCNMoqsO E8hwevX7wk/TMw2hJ2saA5RyFfjDgkhabeLfebfpGtBNCNGLVCT1JuM8GYiR5YYORmWN c2w8fcQG6bGdU9f4ql74WnUqLlpIVLPlsxYVqzJ6AWOGzEXZccw9gwm+vJm5upZGXgrF n3diCtJJKwBr9QUh2HfcB945cWhThm68nsxnJyg8NlJdxbMjSma0qjfa+K8mbwMT1d44 79/g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6CtuZCErZWIlvQlP8U6/r+0Lss1CXFNRNhLUvq7R2Ic=; b=pice2F53n+Wy5sMJ0LfYnOdDn1qbzWs7C4F/OV/Ri1E4ROwz3GMq9kPu0E9qtQ8nEv /5eRiHgEi/ZUy1/zv0W8GdGSEKr8HUlFdgwuPKe0UYvJ74HZyB30O1/aYM+IOmvFxsh9 T1C7H9/1iFlR9gw8WXFkRdDU1x4xVgU9vui5Lqm1Dd6QndJUtgDpYGJdflA/9CZQJMcM LZ0FFh/+nzfIMtABoPShyDIvVUvQktcwiOFIFc+pyFXJkyiWqozDeS5szMhlIoyxcgyI M9Z6kgud8WIi7aI3vdgpadGMXmpGNToho2uOJjHpSoLD8kJ93UFU45XXG18OWcazZsGS SoHA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXpFN6wdDJrV0sLh4d2L6+DY0ZJ/ymy4h7KuvJt1CgRI8SkyfOY kPFpbsxRjjKgl5ZgZkVdS+03U23LAle7IY6+zAdY9A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwi1FyyRGlyfwiqVtuZx9EGPncLwaugCYGhoJBx6n22ljg3ojU4hPd4yK03iA1VmR/mimb+Ypr9HcnHVPS71Xs=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:c6d6:: with SMTP id w205mr17284236lff.17.1572921334550; Mon, 04 Nov 2019 18:35:34 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D2432779493630766752@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com> <4460_1571933453_5DB1CD0D_4460_57_4_5AE9CCAA1B4A2248AB61B4C7F0AD5FB931F030A0@OPEXCAUBM44.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <1572918247420.10381@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
In-Reply-To: <1572918247420.10381@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 18:34:58 -0800
Message-ID: <CABcZeBPy_39o37snzy8F6iyLQMg1aGkYbhy0A1N-PxFUmAmB0g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
Cc: "emile.stephan@orange.com" <emile.stephan@orange.com>, "Gorry Fairhurst (gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk)" <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, tsvwg-chairs <tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org>, "Black, David" <David.Black@dell.com>, "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>, "IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org)" <ippm@ietf.org>, "etosat@ietf.org" <etosat@ietf.org>, "saag@ietf.org" <saag@ietf.org>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>, "quic@ietf.org" <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000067e6fa0596904939"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/bd2YMfMZGGsanSJ-VcVY_zfvu1E>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] TSVWG WGLC: draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-08, closes 23 October 2019
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2019 02:35:39 -0000

On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 5:44 PM Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
wrote:

> I actually think it's a pretty good summary, and delivers exactly what's
> promised in the title.  OTOH I can also see that it's going to get
> bikeshedded
> to death, and will probably never be editable into a form where people
> won't
> complain about it no matter how many changes are made.  Alternatively,
> it'll
> end up watered down to a point where no-one can complain any more but it
> won't
> say anything terribly useful by then.
>
> Perhaps it could be published as is with a comment that it represents the
> opinions of the authors?  Although given that it's Informational and not
> Standards-track or a BCP, that should be a given anyway.
>

Actually, no. Most IETF documents, even informational ones, bear a
statement that they have IETF Consensus.

See: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5741#section-3.2.1

-Ekr


> Peter.
>
>
>
>