[tsvwg] Fwd: [tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options] Minor clarifications to Section 13, Rules for designing new options (Issue #66)
"C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com> Sun, 11 August 2024 04:39 UTC
Return-Path: <heard@pobox.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 626B1C14F703 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Aug 2024 21:39:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jwxb8pUu4HHD for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Aug 2024 21:39:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (pb-smtp21.pobox.com [173.228.157.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64D31C14F70C for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Aug 2024 21:39:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A40822DBC3 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Aug 2024 00:39:09 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h= mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject :to:content-type; s=sasl; bh=eiArQ+VszIgKJb0PjVJYi0AGH8+3ODwrHtv 0LW6EtCI=; b=fo1w7eVNPX8ueNGmSdXzL+LVqo1GuNkU/7w8nnWfn5c/bsQd/tI e44o/tKaI4HBeaIsmzjoqsO6R2ATqDurv638uVQYRn1T/o1xXHQo4As9PiNlRZ5O ZX7V9rS3RaRzehCTZCkZEGG+8kdZA8nRVHH0VaZUU6otwJ1EXCBeY+Oo=
Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CF972DBC2 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Aug 2024 00:39:09 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
Received: from mail-ej1-f51.google.com (unknown [209.85.218.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A15F12DBBF for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Aug 2024 00:39:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
Received: by mail-ej1-f51.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a7aa4ca9d72so402024766b.0 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Aug 2024 21:39:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw/VIGWp4dREpeHAfVlMF5WY9TkygogLCHIKozxFIiQbZuNTJsF lrBIO5XAbBinmhSPWtOj0ojbjVO2QWuRFuq0GkafdDGUGWojQZOzO6lOx7LGJhGrdpvdmxCDTxX 7avohYtdDD24/dYnJzPEAeSFw3NA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGCBovN+yEhKhi873Iu4I7a09rllDptlYd88WWFpfWL7MKEMswhpXXGH2ROThdDTO2SfLjPfxVxEf3GDsDvVJ4=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:f1df:b0:a7a:c812:36bb with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a80aa551e11mr447928666b.8.1723351142290; Sat, 10 Aug 2024 21:39:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/66@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/66@github.com>
From: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2024 21:38:50 -0700
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CACL_3VGmq=DGO5VVTwjt1msSncp7V3HuQuc5h+coet-04mxo_A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACL_3VGmq=DGO5VVTwjt1msSncp7V3HuQuc5h+coet-04mxo_A@mail.gmail.com>
To: TSVWG <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a8e29c061f60f403"
X-Pobox-Relay-ID: A3857276-579B-11EF-BF15-E92ED1CD468F-06080547!pb-smtp21.pobox.com
Message-ID-Hash: AFN7UHGULXMTUZXDBUIP3DDTQJK2CQJO
X-Message-ID-Hash: AFN7UHGULXMTUZXDBUIP3DDTQJK2CQJO
X-MailFrom: heard@pobox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tsvwg.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [tsvwg] Fwd: [tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options] Minor clarifications to Section 13, Rules for designing new options (Issue #66)
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/bfFyfp0DdoogfekY1vTIewaMWqw>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tsvwg-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tsvwg-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tsvwg-leave@ietf.org>
This concerns a post-WGLC issue. Please comment on GitHub <https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/66> if you have concerns. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Mike-Heard <notifications@github.com> Date: Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 9:30 PM Subject: [tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options] Minor clarifications to Section 13, Rules for designing new options (Issue #66) To: tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options < draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options@noreply.github.com> Cc: Mike-Heard <heard@pobox.com>, Your activity < your_activity@noreply.github.com> The editor's copy of -33 has the bolded text added to two placed in Section 13. In the first paragraph: The UDP option Kind space allows for the definition of new options, however the currently defined options *(including AUTH, UENC, and UCMP)* do not allow for arbitrary new options. The following is a summary of rules for new options and their rationales: In the final paragraph: o >> FRAG SHOULD be the first option, when present. *Valid reasons to override this recommendation would include the need to use UENC to encrypt or UCMP to compress the FRAG option itself*. Hopefully these changes are uncontroversial, but please speak up if you find them objectionable. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/66>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BBA6FAT52JBO5KHHMHMUMFDZQ3SGTAVCNFSM6AAAAABMKM75PGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGQ2TSNBRGYZTOMI> . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: <tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/66@github.com>