IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] ECN encapsulation draft - proposed resolution

"Rodney W. Grimes" <ietf@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Wed, 23 June 2021 01:21 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C62F33A2287 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 18:21:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T_R8afVroWR8 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 18:21:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FF053A2282 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 18:21:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id 15N1KnM2073722; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 18:20:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ietf@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net)
Received: (from ietf@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id 15N1Kmf5073721; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 18:20:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ietf)
From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <ietf@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
Message-Id: <202106230120.15N1Kmf5073721@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
In-Reply-To: <0B3F569D-DB80-4869-B341-4FAB97A97755@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 18:20:48 -0700
CC: "alex.burr@ealdwulf.org.uk" <alex.burr@ealdwulf.org.uk>, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>, John Kaippallimalil <kjohn@futurewei.com>, Markku Kojo <kojo=40cs.helsinki.fi@dmarc.ietf.org>, "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>, Markku Kojo <kojo@cs.helsinki.fi>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/c5J3Q9mEr6QXSvn9ZLFD1B6gvUY>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] ECN encapsulation draft - proposed resolution
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 01:21:08 -0000

> > On 23 Jun, 2021, at 1:35 am, alex.burr@ealdwulf.org.uk wrote:
> > 
> > One point: You are talking about Codel below, but the graphs say fq_codel. Regardless of the merits of fq, here I think it is a bit of a confounder to what you want to show. For clarity, could you say if or how fq was in use?
> 
> We set the number of flow queues to 1, thereby effectively disabling FQ.
> 
>  - Jonathan Morton

To reduce any confusion here and in the future this "configuration"
should be noted if it is not.  Something like codel (implemented
using fq_codel with flow queues set to 1), or some such.

Regards,

-- 
Rod Grimes                                                 rgrimes@freebsd.org

v2.37.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status