IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] [Ecn-sane] is FQ actually widely deployed?

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Tue, 23 July 2019 05:34 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87151120096 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 22:34:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swm.pp.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id paYiNd2JsYyc for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 22:34:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79AC7120041 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 22:34:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 1E4A7B5; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 07:34:24 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1563860064; bh=LqfcVATFr0oT1AGZoEcV5wN2KDUpd8k/RAMqNUrnJyE=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=nifH19+/B5y3xkGrWFpBZHYKipx0p8UL2yWTVpAUQv1M5yThETzC6FzzI2ggXHFJx k2yMilZeBADjmM1gvWoOQOXxb0jFzbrh+Z8I+/IOSJIQGr3QIsD8JSuXNP4b/l+x9g qMbG55QaRvM1WxsgZt1oqZ27YCbfpWbMIq+6Hwpk=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C7C4B2; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 07:34:24 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 07:34:24 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
cc: Dave Taht <dave@taht.net>, "ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net" <ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net>, "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4V_NtiuJJDtfVFBt-fHAWhkx7RFNFAaW=5gG3ORvV8cg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1907230732420.19225@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1907221609330.19225@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CAA93jw4V_NtiuJJDtfVFBt-fHAWhkx7RFNFAaW=5gG3ORvV8cg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/c6KWSG2bNqJDmUBhGs5S290wGsg>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] [Ecn-sane] is FQ actually widely deployed?
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 05:34:28 -0000

On Mon, 22 Jul 2019, Dave Taht wrote:

> Hmm? Nearly everything derived from openwrt commercially has it. More 
> generally, debian linux derived Google wifi, chromebooks, eero have 
> publically disclosed their usage.

For CPU based forwarding platforms, perhaps (and these are not the common 
ones). But one of the few OpenWrt hw acceleration platforms (MT7621) then 
FQ is not done on the hw accelerated flows afaik.

HW acceleration typically means FQ goes out the window.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email