From nobody Sat Nov 28 09:06:44 2020
Return-Path: <moeller0@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05D943A0BAD
 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 09:06:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.649
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
 URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
 header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id X5JU74I2Flah for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Sat, 28 Nov 2020 09:06:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D61673A0AF9
 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 09:06:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net;
 s=badeba3b8450; t=1606583193;
 bh=54788ihbhfy5Aru4wpsDJoV18myrwMJhQKKTNXCqYsY=;
 h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To;
 b=BtyzmCMakBm2aa9j3bZkrFp8JHcZI6HtVCkNFFxmix2Frw1xpT2kyRI0Q95lsnHv1
 9d/T9SB9HTbZl5rUvRnI6sZvXgFeFseNC1hMJhgnVtC5k5B15TVSlvF7yqJyme0UuZ
 /cZg+zieqIwxek6nVmtoVbR7/H8NhbjWe4zio+28=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.42.229] ([77.1.27.60]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx105
 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MQeA2-1kWUu71vZ0-00Nigg; Sat, 28
 Nov 2020 18:06:33 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.17\))
From: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2011281723120.26384@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 18:06:31 +0100
Cc: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>,
 tsvwg@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F90BE995-D10A-4FE9-AC57-8C1490DBF2A9@gmx.de>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2011201413100.26384@uplift.swm.pp.se>
 <9B5474B3-4384-4A20-81C3-5251246AA594@gmx.de>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.2011221548210.26384@uplift.swm.pp.se>
 <066C60AF-39A3-41EF-B9E9-938AA1A707F5@gmx.de>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.2011281512350.26384@uplift.swm.pp.se>
 <5A423905-EFD9-4A93-AB46-BACF61FE2D2D@gmail.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.2011281658380.26384@uplift.swm.pp.se>
 <BDB27AE9-0A35-441D-B18F-5CD7C2903AF8@gmail.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.2011281723120.26384@uplift.swm.pp.se>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.17)
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:3/idKET/GnLLiH+Esb8tx44+CwnuiPKSBKeMolnyGgX9n+753JB
 kp853LAg2C3wjRGXQu4coI2l40eUvXBVTjPhB5GO+4y/Oe8VgPTYsMidZt1mJUYQHH1nntP
 Nb6beKiFuekTaTRwYsqD78wGjmydMfZorezDYYQkSklFeMAj31zzsDHNDcSs5iprUKKYTWF
 yxGAnBWDD87nh1wli/1yA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:nKR/FSrZH1Y=:6IiOdzunZdSPDWsHZx0Rdd
 RktKC+pU2oQZDPg/60730G9zsYCxWruY725av/SZbyI2V+1iid3RhvBs9hi9qpucpoB5s1mRD
 F2+oy5GSwX2PFv9VZlWabLbNQ+xmMlGLFobJEs0Y8k68zUxy4oVdoJWYiKpn8o7xXqGaSwclM
 yTrjhfb20K8xeMGbXcRvqViZgpzHXfTvVN8Y+wLP5qEeuQuDFf+9rJ0UbPITLHTVYLBh2nZ5i
 vm9GIeAXiEakopemr0q1Agr7BEi7twbf0TTKD9PLER9WcoftSuiX3o2O4GujRDl7hrPsYx+O9
 muigxtfX2YiWT2PoF6Wa9KCRocRphHSdC/D5RIfX7qKtvmirhBGiGQHlOJnUAlAdqOAJpZMIg
 +Sh7+mrMnCOqQhBo1Ea6KNceKsq8hi1vWQLJQEAg//qHwOVc0JfYqZgt2FJtndoQxctJcjne0
 XcCiOGIiHoEFF6tUHXQhMa83L93uNLb2YONhfYLHb2n3Q1wJp0bMvwRFiltpto8UbWc2PcrTI
 4utTk+6/h1mFa/CiZj5A8V1rquck8bq3aqcitmEQyMMs+SRp7pVka2H4S0ONw6VbLTGP9Kr+u
 LsaQo5DOqzZ+VhJGVKLaWNR9mDRdjJnp97Y6F1DFl1PZ91ZbxcYGc8qR1WuzkCTLFfC3E0Vhv
 29sXTtLZWnT1/gO0THqmLYbefF9VYPa5jSbF/qfzNSORU5ApMER4e2GRoQVxG6CRVjuHEiEm9
 JsEr0lJdwH+cFzGky2NIEL0QHXKf8eXW/SRUJM8nz0HohgwNALLi7rw5JqpfvYdzFKYL0avtJ
 oy8k0h0+xdOAu/inImNSAQ7jRTBbZ9Tlswt/vX1f7JoiGS4eG6bM5vXfrIK4Z+0SYtd/md389
 Mkle4wVEkGkfFmjl8PyQ==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/dkE_aK7zXFovy1JRsS-Rusgp-Nw>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] feedback and thoughts L4S / SCE
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>,
 <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>,
 <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 17:06:42 -0000

Hi Mikael,

I actually wanted to stay out of tis sub thread, but...


> On Nov 28, 2020, at 17:24, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> =
wrote:
>=20
> On Sat, 28 Nov 2020, Jonathan Morton wrote:
>=20
>> Take a random sampling of CPE devices, and see how many of them use =
the above - or it might be easier to count the ones that don't.  I'll =
wait.
>=20
> My ubiquiti APs come with it, but it's default turned off.
>=20
> It's not only important of the devices have the capability, it also =
needs to be default turned on so it's actually used (considering most =
people don't change config much).

	[SM] ... if end-user devices have such capabilities, the big =
ISPs that in all likelihood are the biggest buyers of such devices, =
should have little issues adding that to their requirements list for =
their purchases and making sure devices are configured properly, without =
driving up the costs unduly, no?.=20
	The fact that that has not happened is in itself a rather clear =
indication that ISPs are really not that interested in tackling latency =
under load (and why should they, often unhappy users will switch to a =
higher/more profitable speed tier in a well-intended but not very =
effective attempt at improving a link's usefulness).
	Now, for end-users that is a different issue, and there are =
quite some, often on-line gamers interested in reducing their internet =
access link's latency, that are actually willing to buy and configure =
boutique devices, like the NetDUMA, or more down to earth and less hyped =
(but IMHO even more capable) evenroute's iqrouter. Incidentally, both =
are basically software distributions for relative standard existing =
router's from other manufacturers, and yet people are paying a premium =
to get those better behaving router OS, as latency under load =
performance of stock router OSes often is not "cutting it"...
=09
	I note that L4S never reached out to those end-users actually =
caring for low latency... instead they are trying to convince the ISP =
market, without a narrative how this is going to imprive an ISP's =
bottom-line (the you need to do this to not fall behind the competition, =
is not a positive selling point IMHO).

Best Regards
	Sebastian=

