IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1)

philip.eardley@bt.com Sat, 16 May 2020 15:46 UTC

Return-Path: <philip.eardley@bt.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1A7A3A08B3 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 May 2020 08:46:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=bt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dyZOU0HPjk67 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 May 2020 08:46:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpe1.intersmtp.com (smtpe1.intersmtp.com [62.239.224.234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BCAD3A08AB for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 May 2020 08:46:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tpw09926dag11h.domain1.systemhost.net (10.9.212.35) by RDW083A012ED68.bt.com (10.187.98.38) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Sat, 16 May 2020 16:43:43 +0100
Received: from tpw09926dag10e.domain1.systemhost.net (10.9.202.37) by tpw09926dag11h.domain1.systemhost.net (10.9.212.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Sat, 16 May 2020 16:46:50 +0100
Received: from bwp09926085.bt.com (10.36.82.116) by tpw09926dag10e.domain1.systemhost.net (10.9.202.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 16 May 2020 16:46:50 +0100
Received: from GBR01-CWL-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.20.50) by smtpe1.intersmtp.com (10.36.82.116) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Sat, 16 May 2020 16:46:44 +0100
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=ZycN8uy3mPOCqBPwz2tM/QxP1Yp6e0045GgX4TP5xZzifYB0FLG7AFhPEMLk9kWJEVgTBto8a5mXUmrJpufcRqCTlUc4YHNJH3dYQ8Q/1BX55Q2IDOuK/cTmKdYLbSFtl9RDhgb7HWweh8UpYfunQjIkwmIUFRSZ9Ae8xsQrG4Hbo7sHnRHYh3YBDsG+Jg0Rq7lBjSBOjYCiFxYPAZA/3FK9kdW9qfn5BPOWdcVPMnEIi4ny4ZnOe4wSjE/QVuvQ7vz/xRd4ME1UyqQZIes5lSxUuckdltbWSDoC7CHcKLwSj5G7bHv7m2qh3tYm/UcPcCFIMe4bBYeVoDvSkEJxiw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=PmtYY4Py63+ezQ/AJtSfjyYaXDF5H8y+nCGwc71Xjv0=; b=nITmMKfXhriCUPVgP2sqPNpKmCcBylFL0iaa0/u/ek2KZ8ezjDYie7CZ0yCFdBj+rxMtvPm+9Ms514ojy+RX9BDopo5Og1xFurCjf+n95UOEobFsWk9tvY8VoJQJQBX6C6SUgW1fE/OSVeuyxVG3OUM48vbVOrbgxEueLBfpTagGsnJDp9GSoDF0d06rK8+dCpFrLHcyKT4hS3YzipAsPJnr6rbwsQ+uyT2tKxU46MkXCqj9Ju/GT9yN3pGv+PYqMRmUA89fDhZCJDwMHrDDAq75RkakzeStDI/dX50EuZ5XOyysrcS1aTCJcZXjE+3MEtBQ3B6dr5Tre6xdfC9K2Q==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bt.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=bt.com; dkim=pass header.d=bt.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bt.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=PmtYY4Py63+ezQ/AJtSfjyYaXDF5H8y+nCGwc71Xjv0=; b=NdXJ1H9cxAYhp2SmbLZJOsVulu0mEuevBaGSKzEdHFYKH5r4thoCsx4iHuO/yrFU673RXzeuPJF2oATVFDhUiwiS33M+jAkNqsiXa4apNozmp8ttui0TuhNw1nlzpKKQ6xUYtcGzp0g0V/DDyZwCZvLZjEux9Ja4Ash6x20tEvY=
Received: from LNXP123MB2587.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:600:d8::14) by LNXP123MB2346.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:600:df::21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3000.27; Sat, 16 May 2020 15:46:49 +0000
Received: from LNXP123MB2587.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::e188:c2ef:fbd4:eed6]) by LNXP123MB2587.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::e188:c2ef:fbd4:eed6%3]) with mapi id 15.20.3000.022; Sat, 16 May 2020 15:46:49 +0000
From: philip.eardley@bt.com
To: wes@mti-systems.com, tsvwg@ietf.org
Thread-Topic: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1)
Thread-Index: AQHWIj//46K8J1wNNk6EnL7V8MmPzaiq7dKQ
Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 15:46:49 +0000
Message-ID: <LNXP123MB2587ECE4C106BA7E80ED8280EBBA0@LNXP123MB2587.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <46720ce0-ffcb-e97f-3e2d-6b5274b73b15@mti-systems.com>
In-Reply-To: <46720ce0-ffcb-e97f-3e2d-6b5274b73b15@mti-systems.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: mti-systems.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;mti-systems.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=bt.com;
x-originating-ip: [109.156.116.248]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 48ef26dd-9ce1-4cf8-562d-08d7f9b05893
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: LNXP123MB2346:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <LNXP123MB23462524D13673EEB5737644EBBA0@LNXP123MB2346.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
x-antispam-2: 1
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 040513D301
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:LNXP123MB2587.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(39860400002)(136003)(396003)(366004)(376002)(346002)(5660300002)(478600001)(71200400001)(8936002)(86362001)(52536014)(55016002)(26005)(186003)(53546011)(2906002)(76116006)(316002)(66574014)(166002)(110136005)(7696005)(33656002)(6506007)(66946007)(9686003)(66446008)(66556008)(66476007)(64756008)(8676002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_LNXP123MB2587ECE4C106BA7E80ED8280EBBA0LNXP123MB2587GBRP_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 48ef26dd-9ce1-4cf8-562d-08d7f9b05893
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 May 2020 15:46:49.0606 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: a7f35688-9c00-4d5e-ba41-29f146377ab0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: holeV/avZsTrnMAAlzpg6TgFKjLwjQVHZ/6ns70oY3QeBEtuKvkVyusd3yyJa3g1dDrdJ891Ijo9gPRq92Zm7A==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: LNXP123MB2346
X-OriginatorOrg: bt.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/e3ZF3YJ84dgpOGlGekXVQv-Kkb0>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 15:46:57 -0000

I support using ECT(1) as an input signal to the network.

Best wishes
phil
From: tsvwg <tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Wesley Eddy
Sent: 04 May 2020 19:15
To: tsvwg@ietf.org
Subject: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1)


In this email thread, please state, concisely, which of the following viewpoints on ECT(1) you prefer. Please have extended discussion in a different thread. If you are uncomfortable sharing your opinion on the list, you may email the tsvwg chairs directly (tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org>).


If you did not attend the 27 April interim, please watch the meeting video [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dw3YKyeFxQU] for context on this question.


  1.  I support using ECT(1) as an input signal to the network. This is the approach consistent with the current L4S drafts. This position does not mean that there are no remaining issues with L4S, but that the remaining issues can be resolved by continued WG effort on the current drafts.
  2.  I support using ECT(1) as an output signal from the network. This is consistent with SCE. If you believe L4S will not be safe for the internet without significant architectural changes, you are in this group.
  3.  There is a specific test or tests I need to see before making a decision about ECT(1). Please be specific about the tests in your response.


Please submit your opinion by 5/18/2020.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email