[tsvwg] Re: WGLC for comments for draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options and draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-dplpmtud to end 1st May 2024

[Erik Auerswald <[e-mail]>]

Hi Mike,

the first and third issues are still open (section numbers in the
UDP Options draft have increased since the last adjustment of those
in draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-dplpmtud -- possibly because of the
addition of the two early sections "UDP Option Intended Uses" and "UDP
Option Design Principles").

The second issue, paraphrased "s/MSS/MDS/", is addressed in -12.

Thanks,
Erik


On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 08:04:38AM -0700, C. M. Heard wrote:
>   Erik,
> 
> I opened Issue #30
> <https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-udp-options-dplpmtud/issues/30> to cover
> the following comments. If
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-dplpmtud-12
> (just
> posted) satisfactorily addresses them, please let us know.
> 
> Mike Heard
> 
> On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 1:57 AM Erik Auerswald <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > a bit late, but here are a few nits regarding
> > draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-dplpmtud-11:
> >
> >   * Section 3.2 on page 6 refers to wrong section of
> >     I-D.ietf-tsvwg-udp-options for EOL:
> >
> >         (Section 9.1 of [I-D.ietf-tsvwg-udp-options])
> >     --->
> >         (Section 11.1 of [I-D.ietf-tsvwg-udp-options])
> >
> >   * Section 4.2 on page 8 uses "Maximum Segment Size" / "MSS" instead of
> >     "Maximum Datagram Size" / "MDS":
> >
> >         ...When the remote endpoint advertises a UDP Maximum
> >         Segment Size (MSS) option,...
> >     --->
> >         ...When the remote endpoint advertises a UDP Maximum
> >         Datagram Size (MDS) option,...
> >
> >   * Section 4.4 on page 9 has a wrong section reference for the UDP
> >     Options API:
> >
> >         ...(Section 13 of
> >         [I-D.ietf-tsvwg-udp-options]).
> >     --->
> >         ...(Section 15 of
> >         [I-D.ietf-tsvwg-udp-options]).
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Erik
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 08:02:12PM +0100, Gorry Fairhurst wrote:
> > > This is a reminder of the on-going 3 weeks WG Last Call to determine if
> > the
> > > following TSVWG IDs are ready:
> > >
> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/
> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-dplpmtud/
> > >
> > > These documents both target PROPOSED STANDARD.
> > >
> > > The document shepherd for the UDP Options will be: Gorry Fairhurst.
> > > The document shepherd for DPLPMTUD with UDP Options will be: Marten
> > Seemann.
> > >
> > > The WGLC will end at midnight UTC on 1st May 2024.
> > >
> > > Please do read the drafts, and please do send any comments/concerns
> > > to  the TSVWG mailing list, including notes on whether these are
> > > ready to publish (or send an email directly to the
> > > chairs<[e-mail]>).
> > >
> > > Best wishes,
> > > Gorry and Marten
> > > (tsvwg co-chairs)
> > >
> > > —
> > >
> > > The IETF WG Last Call process is described in RFC 6174.