IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] [Ecn-sane] Compatibility with singlw queue RFC3168 AQMs

John Leslie <john@jlc.net> Fri, 09 August 2019 23:26 UTC

Return-Path: <john@jlc.net>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A21AF120059 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 16:26:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LEiB7jaxruGr for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 16:26:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.jlc.net (mailhost.jlc.net [199.201.159.4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC6EE120048 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 16:26:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mailhost.jlc.net (Postfix, from userid 104) id 1CA02908910; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 19:26:02 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2019 19:26:02 -0400
From: John Leslie <john@jlc.net>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Cc: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20190809232602.GF51059@verdi>
References: <77522c07-6f2e-2491-ba0e-cbef62aad194@bobbriscoe.net> <619092c0-640f-56c2-19c9-1cc486180c8b@bobbriscoe.net> <3A454B00-AEBC-48B6-9A8A-922C66E884A7@gmx.de> <21E40F44-2151-4565-970E-E1CEBE975036@gmx.de> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949363063EA1C@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com> <58F8052E-A56B-4E1F-8E1D-CBE75A0F7332@akamai.com> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D2432779493630640036@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com> <9C42D7E8-734A-4620-B95B-5FFDDF1D3D95@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1908071036090.21828@uplift.swm.pp.se> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1908071202570.21828@uplift.swm.pp.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1908071202570.21828@uplift.swm.pp.se>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/ffLKhYEe5laaKKGIHjy_gWkin3Q>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] [Ecn-sane] Compatibility with singlw queue RFC3168 AQMs
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2019 23:26:05 -0000

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:
> 
> I forgot to also mention that I still would like to see more testing of 
> the benefits of removing the ordering requirement on some traffic. Having 
> been exposed to different medias over the past 25 years I've seen numerous 
> Head-of-Line blocking problems my fair share of time and removing this 
> ordering requirement would free up some medias to deliver some packets 
> even though other packets are being re-transmitted and delivered later.

   +1

--
John Leslie <john@jlc.net>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email