Re: [tsvwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-heist-tsvwg-ecn-deployment-observations-00.txt

[Pete Heist <[e-mail]>]

Hi Bob, I got a reply back from one admin that to his knowledge they
never used single queue AQMs in this environment. Jon summed up the
rest...

Regards,
Pete

On Fri, 2021-02-19 at 12:50 +0000, Bob Briscoe wrote:
> Pete,
> 
> Thank you for this work.
> 
> Given you have close contact with this ISP, have you asked, or could
> you ask them whether they have ever deployed any FIFO ECN-enabled
> AQMs themselves? 
> 
> Cheers
> 
> 
> Bob
> 
> On 18/02/2021 16:38, Pete Heist wrote:
> 
> > A new version of I-D, draft-heist-tsvwg-ecn-deployment-
> observations-00.txt
> > has been successfully submitted by Peter G. Heist and posted to the
> > IETF repository.
> > 
> > Name: draft-heist-tsvwg-ecn-deployment-observations
> > Revision: 00
> > Title: Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN)
> Deployment Observations
> > Document date: 2021-02-18
> > Group: Individual Submission
> > Pages: 27
> > URL:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-heist-tsvwg-ecn-deployment-observations-00.txt
> > Status:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-heist-tsvwg-ecn-deployment-observations/
> > Html:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-heist-tsvwg-ecn-deployment-observations-00.html
> > Htmlized:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-heist-tsvwg-ecn-deployment-observations-00
> > 
> > Abstract:
> > This note presents data gathered at an Internet Service Provider's
> > gateway on the observed deployment and usage of ECN. Relevant IP
> > counter and flow tracking data was collected and analyzed for TCP
> and
> > other protocols.
> This draft adds some data on the current usage of ECN. It was
> gathered over several weeks at a cooperative ISP with around 660
> members, and looks at ECN endpoint activity, AQM deployment and ECN
> usage on non-TCP protocols. While this study is still relatively
> small, it’s hopefully at least a little more useful than the
> stateless counter data I posted late last year, which should set the
> bar suitably low… :)
> 
> Pete
> 
>