[tsvwg] Weekly github digest (TSV Working Group GitHub Activity Summary)
Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 28 July 2024 08:51 UTC
Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2181C14F5F6 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Jul 2024 01:51:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.704
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.704 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=mnot.net header.b="rCk9iOxB"; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="EaUCtNb4"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pQ79rfHofCyD for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Jul 2024 01:51:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.144]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 543F5C14F708 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Jul 2024 01:51:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailfout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3627B138062A for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Jul 2024 03:39:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 28 Jul 2024 03:39:15 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:from:from:in-reply-to :mime-version:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t= 1722152355; x=1722238755; bh=0gMcy11a9n6hJvNHwLm2Y4mrBjNKxbDGHwO cfe3VfgE=; b=rCk9iOxBXi54UxegudtsLjjhbTfDU7k/VG/pg3fC/UMuDvNd+Si /V7NA9J9AiNiEmcG+q4sv/UblDrZ2POezmBnEuY7WCC7GRSj95o7JhHl4pDS0Wfr go3m765pKrQLuyFT6tviRjpl40IYUmmXN7bSOmGh5gyjh3vWeUYkVkVLI7IMVWDZ JvmxjhNBEPORhs38H6W8dK7AW2erQ2pjxzWmWAU2N4bGL0aOgj77EgvHG/LDUCWY 2J7wnvO8wL/pT81XdXMNJIC1UQnmRXIkqbbPdgA5cBvWVG+wOEWgHsb7n7noFsNG reGEzji20XvuG5reIGDWaeXdiUgIbW5Wd5A==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:mime-version :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1722152355; x= 1722238755; bh=0gMcy11a9n6hJvNHwLm2Y4mrBjNKxbDGHwOcfe3VfgE=; b=E aUCtNb41qECL7jMa9x4wX0eSFZwLkgCdAC+ZNnqDAExNjpyX7qsn1Zpbl5za/AlP LwjvuDkjTco612IGM8cIk8y2R6r0TU2tUVjyBrsZNrPu1FHSyIrFjN/2jtUqIV+c /xQMOOaRbDgqv0fFTUCns0pmBEsgNxucBpx8oJlcbY17RIinux0qPqj/pOCtR98G 14D76Qiz/7wL4uji+Z+pLtygPsQyNMbadHsYshK5Nu0vvOmYJaAXtfBgyLkzQFSt zuy857w666Nx0hFRmZmzVIhQmm/MDSZxDL6Tx+LVUcPtenyRjWdgmPV+Jum5PAF/ GrFhiPXtJUeMFeSZP+o9w==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:o_WlZr45gv3GyTmjtBkGpOROSPQ5yn5i7uumo9Lxn3c42N6_Mgi_TA> <xme:o_WlZg5mcTcFKVqVuA6oo_tMPzSAqF0RGUVQdn9WBBGNnqrPe6UtAKJt51D1y58P6 Q3HFMCavJ2js-qaDQ>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:o_WlZidgQa2qQvugoFplnPEjqUoemFGEBUU8F-LrKmZ91qZ3WXrmKqcwJc7zXQ1izpYexUUsSI-2SDwrBAzVh626OEbbpjUFNW2GEn5Kza9zUINO-wywmGE0DApIQHXpVw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrieelgddulecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecupfhoucgurghtvgcufhhivghlugculdegledmnecujf gurheptggghffvufesrgdttdertddtjeenucfhrhhomheptfgvphhoshhithhorhihucet tghtihhvihhthicuufhumhhmrghrhicuuehothcuoeguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmh hnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekfedvudetjedvfeekheeiveeugfef hfetteevgeffkefffeetffdvleehudeiteenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrdgtoh hmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepugho pghnohhtpghrvghplhihsehmnhhothdrnhgvthdpnhgspghrtghpthhtoheptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:o_WlZsJmEDy8Lj3z-rlX-iYHo4CUw97QUVLOEKLQvP0pXkI-zgkU8A> <xmx:o_WlZvLQaYJt2Kl8SxFifZ07n6jS38QvqFfGBbftIu2F6Zk3E483yw> <xmx:o_WlZlz_xZTV_-T7Ro63LlE6SuZLGGIHSMDvSWPr-pSDoWStROP_jw> <xmx:o_WlZrLzJ985EXCKVjCsXJPaZrY7ivMyJysMZOt587pel4ZhchQsWw> <xmx:o_WlZmVKL8ZkIxYucrE3uBQ_f8znqNIOeCYfhQsy3bOhWr9Xd_S1iGKc>
Feedback-ID: i1c3946f2:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Jul 2024 03:39:14 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============2669372167835376714=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: tsvwg@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20240728085135.543F5C14F708@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2024 01:51:35 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: FTLRNTDC7TQVEX42HGJWCJXSUCRELEUZ
X-Message-ID-Hash: FTLRNTDC7TQVEX42HGJWCJXSUCRELEUZ
X-MailFrom: do_not_reply@mnot.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tsvwg.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [tsvwg] Weekly github digest (TSV Working Group GitHub Activity Summary)
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/gyBHgSHIrtc0ImihBAFehm1g8D8>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tsvwg-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tsvwg-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tsvwg-leave@ietf.org>
Issues
------
* tsvwg/ietf-multipath-dccp (+0/-0/š¬1)
1 issues received 1 new comments:
- #302 What does "physically isolated path" mean? (1 by gorryfair)
https://github.com/tsvwg/ietf-multipath-dccp/issues/302
* tsvwg/careful-resume (+2/-1/š¬5)
2 issues created:
- MS: Is the term endpoint token needed? (by gorryfair)
https://github.com/tsvwg/careful-resume/issues/49
- CH: Can we add text to explain the design principles? (by gorryfair)
https://github.com/tsvwg/careful-resume/issues/48
3 issues received 5 new comments:
- #49 MS: Is the term endpoint token needed? (1 by gorryfair)
https://github.com/tsvwg/careful-resume/issues/49
- #48 CH: Can we add text to explain the design principles? (1 by gorryfair)
https://github.com/tsvwg/careful-resume/issues/48
- #22 Section 3.2 Editor note: Reconnaissance Phase (Is there a need for a minimum required number of RTT samples to confirm a path?) (3 by gorryfair, joergdeutschmann-i7)
https://github.com/tsvwg/careful-resume/issues/22
1 issues closed:
- Section 3.2 Editor note: Reconnaissance Phase (Is there a need for a minimum required number of RTT samples to confirm a path?) https://github.com/tsvwg/careful-resume/issues/22
* tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options (+0/-2/š¬6)
5 issues received 6 new comments:
- #57 Erik: correct or remove erroneous note in Step 3 of the fragmentation procedure (Section 11.4) (1 by jtouch)
https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/57 [Proposed text in issue]
- #33 Med: WGLC Minor NiTs (1 by jtouch)
https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/33 [Proposed text in issue]
- #29 Should UDP ExIDs be distinct from TCP ExIDs, or use a common namespace? (2 by jtouch)
https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/29 [Proposed text in issue]
- #28 IANA evaluation response (1 by jtouch)
https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/28 [Expected resolved]
- #2 Suggestion for reduced RDOS text (1 by jtouch)
https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/2
2 issues closed:
- IANA evaluation response https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/28 [Expected resolved]
- Should UDP ExIDs be distinct from TCP ExIDs, or use a common namespace? https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/29 [Proposed text in issue]
Pull requests
-------------
* tsvwg/careful-resume (+1/-0/š¬0)
1 pull requests submitted:
- Update draft-ietf-tsvwg-careful-resume.xml (by gorryfair)
https://github.com/tsvwg/careful-resume/pull/50
Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-udp-options-dplpmtud
* https://github.com/tsvwg/ietf-multipath-dccp
* https://github.com/tsvwg/careful-resume
* https://github.com/tsvwg/zero-checksum
* https://github.com/tsvwg/ietf-l4sops
* https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options
- [tsvwg] Weekly github digest (TSV Working Group Gā¦ Repository Activity Summary Bot