Re: [tsvwg] Call for feedback after IETF-113: Should draft-ietf-tsvwg-dtls-over-sctp-bis obsolete RFC 6083?
Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Wed, 04 May 2022 08:08 UTC
Return-Path: <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C36C14F725; Wed, 4 May 2022 01:08:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.671
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.671 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.575, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ericsson.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mrGn2BQNmmUn; Wed, 4 May 2022 01:08:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR05-DB8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-db8eur05on2061b.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:7e1a::61b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85153C14F722; Wed, 4 May 2022 01:08:12 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=gHK4Lb6ogd0Yk2C7P+bHJ922VBdc5rxihD0omHfT7rR1Qmx45mwJrm+jVzHeIOflPt5W7FJ6GkByRqhXFwQ9HEwvaT9PkuenBmKD66tPtDircnMmDTfrhjOapgQYkO/SjR7PXsqH4/3OPB5JUpmWvqI2Y20OBfW1wio+QWoUQu7qXjGlR5nhrT5NvYozMcYEfjHD2c2h0ErEy6TDjKCtVAkR+6dwugnLYB3ebPT4UY0iM35aHC5lvYztRxKXbPSx7DlbDyrrZBmgIEso/p9iO3akfPtQOZrG4qK+lLdnP6c8M4FF0FsTj30EATUoilCl+ThjuCoQFZQEubno2SlF6w==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=6TK5ikb6doFsMfk7np2c0xBRIRizlYLMHLCyB2ZsSC0=; b=SJf9xNVKvf85PDP76j93TP5q6ZTHnmO5aFHWHEQdxJwXqulFqu6xugf+veR2Xddtc5+lfwuMgWNKlZM/kATXh7NOpiWioi92mlI1FAml3NKzC0CA84t0r0wgj8KcNpyt7hhClpqQ1OQFYqPM6Q2Jy9R3k3EPI2PoQwZpQ5M6KWZVFzJhRmfFzOMPCsqGhal4pVUhSokoMm0yxhq4pt+3K5y79GayGYvC4NJ5+0thwlVeBx08eJ553r+lpLaUEsa8/ky5O9Ho8xMiz7PvB95SEY9QnOTIM5Ywx5ZLXFyEAItF9zFkJXvbKqL8dVwEI35CQAx5jszufDVTxyaS3sxa3Q==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ericsson.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=ericsson.com; dkim=pass header.d=ericsson.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericsson.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=6TK5ikb6doFsMfk7np2c0xBRIRizlYLMHLCyB2ZsSC0=; b=svmCi43HmF5mG2Sxoj6aBsue2msL7Ipua4bMSTwT4QksYNSStXHG4iEueD4g7sPlCSlDoOLjGOvFJDeYaonhX+NKaFcL1WjJjKeWtd9HLaBL6+awxxqW5cNP4OvIjcHvDxt+mzTWrYBHtTXlxwzNXpuZSUJIcZEbxzgs3od8LLA=
Received: from PA4PR07MB8414.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:102:2a2::6) by AS8PR07MB7797.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:352::22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5206.6; Wed, 4 May 2022 08:08:05 +0000
Received: from PA4PR07MB8414.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6439:119c:2aa7:7bbd]) by PA4PR07MB8414.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6439:119c:2aa7:7bbd%4]) with mapi id 15.20.5206.012; Wed, 4 May 2022 08:08:05 +0000
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
To: "tuexen@fh-muenster.de" <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>, "gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk" <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
CC: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>, "tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org" <tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [tsvwg] Call for feedback after IETF-113: Should draft-ietf-tsvwg-dtls-over-sctp-bis obsolete RFC 6083?
Thread-Index: AQHYVuNoUQUlmsMrVUu/xMp8wH8m1q0NtTAAgAC3K+A=
Date: Wed, 04 May 2022 08:08:05 +0000
Message-ID: <PA4PR07MB8414BF9B0447020B8585F36D95C39@PA4PR07MB8414.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <2df510e2-bde3-893e-bb91-f8534c097261@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <42F31C5B-6144-42BA-9E87-3CFB742F7B71@fh-muenster.de>
In-Reply-To: <42F31C5B-6144-42BA-9E87-3CFB742F7B71@fh-muenster.de>
Accept-Language: en-US, sv-SE
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=ericsson.com;
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: ebbdcb55-6c2f-4cd5-3e37-08da2da5378d
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AS8PR07MB7797:EE_
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AS8PR07MB7797F7D1D131C780C7FF4B3395C39@AS8PR07MB7797.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-relay: 0
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:PA4PR07MB8414.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(13230001)(4636009)(366004)(4326008)(8676002)(86362001)(2906002)(76116006)(66446008)(66476007)(83380400001)(64756008)(54906003)(122000001)(66946007)(66556008)(99936003)(508600001)(71200400001)(316002)(38070700005)(38100700002)(55016003)(5660300002)(186003)(26005)(9686003)(7696005)(8936002)(44832011)(6506007)(82960400001)(52536014)(110136005)(33656002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-chunkcount: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-0: 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
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="SHA1"; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0054_01D85F9E.D7BF7570"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: ericsson.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: PA4PR07MB8414.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: ebbdcb55-6c2f-4cd5-3e37-08da2da5378d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 04 May 2022 08:08:05.0891 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 92e84ceb-fbfd-47ab-be52-080c6b87953f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: +wgjR5leEdMg9/8qzYPvudzyBEn32wKGYyw/87WMfPrFFnh/O9AZQhoDnUW/RdxloYNd0l20/fsjkjaD4UgWwQRxgjkiohog4R9uvh/YQOQ=
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AS8PR07MB7797
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/c20ItR7EIVzjuu7pW93xe3YL1X0>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Call for feedback after IETF-113: Should draft-ietf-tsvwg-dtls-over-sctp-bis obsolete RFC 6083?
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2022 08:08:17 -0000
> > > > (b) Modify the work item to publish draft-ietf-tsvwg-dtls-over-sctp-bis as a > PS that does NOT obsolete RFC 6083. This would postpone any decision > about whether to obsolete RFC 6083 and allows a different update for > RFC6083. This also requires that draft-ietf-tsvwg-dtls-over-sctp-bis includes > consideration of how the two altenative specs can co-exist. > If it makes sense or not to spend the resources depends on whether it is > possible > to work around the IPRs or not. This can't be decided before the IPRs have > been > published. But I guess the authors of draft-ietf-tsvwg-dtls-over-sctp-bis are > not > willing to wait for that to happen before the document progresses. No, we don't see waiting is particular productive. The first IPR will be 18 month by the end of June. However, the second one will not be 18 month until somewhere in Q1 next year. From my perspective I think it is better to continue towards publication of draft-ietf-tsvwg-dtls-over-sctp-bis and the question of obsoleting or not will need to be settled prior to the WG last call. Hopefully that would be coming up rather soon as we hope to solved all issues with the next version. Cheers Magnus Westerlund
- [tsvwg] Call for feedback after IETF-113: Should … Gorry Fairhurst
- Re: [tsvwg] Call for feedback after IETF-113: Sho… tuexen
- Re: [tsvwg] Call for feedback after IETF-113: Sho… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [tsvwg] Call for feedback after IETF-113: Sho… tuexen
- [tsvwg] Feedback after IETF-113: Should draft-iet… Gorry Fairhurst