[tsvwg] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-tsvwg-tinymt32-02: (with COMMENT)

[Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tsvwg-tinymt32-02: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-tinymt32/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree with Eric that a reference to MT would be really good.

As mentioned in the intro, "neither TinyMT nor MT are meant to be used for
cryptographic applications". Please add this also to the security
considerations section and maybe further explain risks.

Similar as the feedback originally provided (by other ADs) for
draft-ietf-tsvwg-rlc-fec-scheme, I would prefer to have the algorithm specified
in text and not only as code.