IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] [Ecn-sane] Compatibility with singlw queue RFC3168 AQMs

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Wed, 07 August 2019 10:06 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8655A1205D5 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 03:06:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swm.pp.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A8CMnS5---hv for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 03:06:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D1211204D6 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 03:06:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 8103AB4; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 12:06:08 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1565172368; bh=qppBcLKN5F/Zq5piF3PnkcXWEVuf9+e3LzEocKipdi4=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=1Zks0GUShdFuboYImBfFf0rBbXWx9YE5NcD2FZKM3LhIabcAqNnaGfBFEUzMQkItT UYW8FDCsQSG/EHSCTb00WbhFXFUKmstdLjtlMlxL9TPXlGscD2Df20jucCDE2cQ4FL 4eN/EqdUbQEXp+wP1cSGjNhlF1ibj06EeNOk/CMA=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CD12B1; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 12:06:08 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2019 12:06:08 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
cc: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>, Bob Briscoe <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>, "Black, David" <David.Black@dell.com>, "ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net" <ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net>, Dave Taht <dave@taht.net>, "De Schepper, Koen (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <koen.de_schepper@nokia-bell-labs.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1908071036090.21828@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1908071202570.21828@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <364514D5-07F2-4388-A2CD-35ED1AE38405@akamai.com> <AM4PR07MB3459487C8A79B1152E132CE1B9CB0@AM4PR07MB3459.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <87ef2myqzv.fsf@taht.net> <a85d38ba-98ac-e43e-7610-658f4d03e0f4@mti-systems.com> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949363062879C@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com> <e1660988-3651-0c3b-cdc1-5518f067e42e@bobbriscoe.net> <4B02593C-E67F-4587-8B7E-9127D029AED9@gmx.de> <34e3b1b0-3c4c-bb6a-82c1-89ac14d5fd2c@bobbriscoe.net> <E031B993-DAAF-4BE4-A542-33C44310D6E9@gmx.de> <77522c07-6f2e-2491-ba0e-cbef62aad194@bobbriscoe.net> <619092c0-640f-56c2-19c9-1cc486180c8b@bobbriscoe.net> <3A454B00-AEBC-48B6-9A8A-922C66E884A7@gmx.de> <21E40F44-2151-4565-970E-E1CEBE975036@gmx.de> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949363063EA1C@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com> <58F8052E-A56B-4E1F-8E1D-CBE75A0F7332@akamai.com> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D2432779493630640036@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com> <9C42D7E8-734A-4620-B95B-5FFDDF1D3D95@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1908071036090.21828@uplift.swm.pp.se>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/kAJ99lYh9-49nfKTtf5-XGuMu_0>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] [Ecn-sane] Compatibility with singlw queue RFC3168 AQMs
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2019 10:06:13 -0000

On Wed, 7 Aug 2019, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:

> I realise this is problematic and gets in the way of progress but the 
> Internet is a messy place and we need to do mitigation of pathological 
> cases where new and old don't always play nice together.

I forgot to also mention that I still would like to see more testing of 
the benefits of removing the ordering requirement on some traffic. Having 
been exposed to different medias over the past 25 years I've seen numerous 
Head-of-Line blocking problems my fair share of time and removing this 
ordering requirement would free up some medias to deliver some packets 
even though other packets are being re-transmitted and delivered later.

I also encourage if we can reach overall consensus that transports should 
take into account that packets can be re-ordered and what timescales would 
be acceptable for this to happen (1ms? 10ms? 100ms? Even more? Less? Not 
at all?)

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email