Re: [tsvwg] WG Last Call (WGLC) for draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options and draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-dplpmtud

[[e-mail]]

Hi Gorry, all, 

All the comments I raised for these drafts in the past were addressed in previous revisions, except the point about aligning draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-dplpmtud language to sync with tagging RES/REQ as must-support option: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/QKWM8Z4MpdzsJkCodtxHekulkS0/. Statements such as the following one should be to reworded (as we are not setting a new requirement here vs the base spec):

   A UDP Options node that supports DPLPMTUD MUST support sending and
   receiving of the REQ Option and the RES Option.

Other parts may be tweaked also to avoid repeating the following requirement from the base spec: 

   >> All "must-support" options MUST be processed by receivers, if
   present (presuming UDP options are supported at that receiver).

Other than that, I think both drafts are ready to move forward. Thanks for the effort put into this. 

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : tsvwg <[e-mail]> De la part de Gorry Fairhurst
> Envoyé : mardi 10 janvier 2023 19:42
> À : [e-mail]
> Cc : [e-mail]
> Objet : [tsvwg] WG Last Call (WGLC) for draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-
> options and draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-dplpmtud
> 
> This email starts a 3 week WG Last Call call to determine if the
> following TSVWG IDs are ready to publish:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-
> dplpmtud/
> 
> These documents target PROPOSED STANDARD.
> 
> The document shepherd  for the UDP Options will be: Gorry
> Fairhurst.
> The document shepherd  for DPLPMTUD with UDP Options will be:
> Marten Seemann.
> 
> The WGLC will end at midnight UTC on 31st Jan 2023.
> 
> Please do read the drafts, and send any comments/concerns to the
> TSVWG mailing list, including notes on whether these are ready to
> publish (or send an email directly to the chairs <tsvwg-
> [e-mail]>).
> 
> Best wishes,
> Gorry and Marten
> (tsvwg co-chairs)
> 
> —
> The IETF WG Last Call process is described in RFC 6174.


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.