[tsvwg] [Errata Verified] RFC8311 (5649)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 11 March 2019 09:24 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B66F13111D; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 02:24:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.19
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.19 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, L_8BIT_MISMATCH=0.01, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EV0vvaFjbEgW; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 02:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF2A313104D; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 02:24:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 540E0B8223C; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 02:24:10 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf@bobbriscoe.net, david.black@dell.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: ietf@kuehlewind.net, iesg@ietf.org, tsvwg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20190311092410.540E0B8223C@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 02:24:10 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/l2oSlUm_pGUs-74Xcfdp5WHiwGY>
Subject: [tsvwg] [Errata Verified] RFC8311 (5649)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 09:24:26 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC8311, "Relaxing Restrictions on Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) Experimentation". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5649 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Editorial Reported by: Bob Briscoe <ietf@bobbriscoe.net> Date Reported: 2019-03-10 Verified by: Mirja Kühlewind (IESG) Section: 3. Original Text ------------- see Appendix B.1 of [ECN-L4S]. Corrected Text -------------- see Appendix C.1 of [ECN-L4S]. Notes ----- At the end of Section 8. there is another reference to the same information in the same Appendix: See Appendix C.1 of [ECN-L4S] for discussion of alternatives to the ECN nonce. So we have to change one to be consistent with the other. Let's use C.1, because that is the current number of the appendix in the relevant draft. -------------------------------------- RFC8311 (draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation-08) -------------------------------------- Title : Relaxing Restrictions on Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) Experimentation Publication Date : January 2018 Author(s) : D. Black Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Transport Area Working Group Area : Transport Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [tsvwg] [Errata Verified] RFC8311 (5649) RFC Errata System