Re: [tsvwg] TCP Prague's RFC 5033 guidelines status?

[Wesley Eddy <[e-mail]>]

On 11/10/2019 3:58 PM, Holland, Jake wrote:
> Hi l4s-arch authors,
>
> In a side discussion, Pete mentioned the RFC 5033 guidelines list for
> new congestion controls, and looking through the items in Section 3, I
> wasn't sure whether or not they were all addressed in the L4S drafts and
> references:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5033#section-3
>
> Would it be possible to add a section that goes through the points from
> RFC 5033 section 3 and provides pointers to the text and/or research
> results you know of that addresses each of them?
>
> I think it would be very helpful for the review of the proposal to have
> those listed out instead of trying to find them by digging through the
> documents and references.
>
> I guess it would also be OK to provide such a map on the mailing list,
> but I'll suggest that I think it would be more helpful if there's a way
> to include it as a section in one of the drafts.
>
> (And if people agree this is a useful addition, should we open a new
> issue to track it?)


Across threads, some of what we're discussing as "L4S" is really TCP 
Prague end-host code or algorithms, and not strictly the L4S in-network 
parts that we're currently chartered for in TSVWG.

I think 5033 is more relevant to the TCP Prague behaviors that use the 
signals coming from L4S queues, than the L4S in-network behavior by itself.