Re: [tsvwg] [saag] Comments on draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-08.txt

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Tue, 05 November 2019 20:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25BB7120BF3 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 12:45:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FzGEH4Wnkq-r for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 12:45:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12d.google.com (mail-lf1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF753120BFD for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 12:45:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id z12so16185961lfj.9 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 12:45:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XlrdPLkPNzpZtj1Mee+w6mVGKdJ+D41a8zri8kzubF0=; b=H91epACQnVU6IK7nId6Tt/Cpzkl4PyeW8uRY8vtFO/j0kuWMC6ZkpSAqckZgqli5de ZsTSDkJmTdWUsyXjDmigMg6lOiBxuPUtEVE7+KHCW79xIghzmyKM6mGTiDJqs5arrA2o fmTxoAbzYT6+ldLnXAJn7txjC/etSnCAPxRTFT/iWu3ocXw1DPQs4QxbomsSLJZGlwn0 qeVoO6etPWjnMP0cQUWhO/QJs4i2aqrQnYOMILJWlxlkvEyxumk/nIV4ar0jsT9/1a7i zN0i0yTwqFoy1Hj8GyGM6ugHmAR0/T8PnfU9e99F+BEQESOP5bt/BmmTGF9tKmrEHzMY ZD5g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XlrdPLkPNzpZtj1Mee+w6mVGKdJ+D41a8zri8kzubF0=; b=gjkuJ15vdkRtq0iYy/5TlA3Vq61yeyda32QUe07rAYEENMygC7Y96rTgyZM67wTbPm 5wYqjRatPhrmD7x4pVecAdg3G0nLGnCc+Q9jKSfX/xgRzJxO3RamyDNRH8MtOBvgAbER BRMGlOlIqsvulkqGqG23F2QNwlLwcqrMAtu3YFQ0jwzRx+spff5NiwVQLFBGuT2D5pD4 VKo8UBvduLPGBzlKeCtub5H6KBGNW8A4nF9eoadkocg6IlqLBZiho4B4XgK1Kagwz3B/ 7qv1Eyi5PO6SS5q5TjC8bo2rADdNKp3EN4GhnDbSLJUjr7SUU9VWc6hCfbycihGjOMW8 p1hw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWz7r7OHrFVJBIymQUZ+MNCRo+vuIWKeQ2PwsiDu1I3Uui7L1vb HgnPSKm6XNR4dQ/rfOlAFuk2h4TaW9OUFPYCPCybuQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqySZbKa+aE1kVmYvICn2n97MiO0fQCmmXPuTTLgQ2sGGFuqo0kBMNN6k34k4BZdb2/4fi7+Z32VaC3unwqZMV4=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:f107:: with SMTP id p7mr21244942lfh.91.1572986736049; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 12:45:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABcZeBPajzuEdw8=M1g1i-TAniJ9O+H5dEMxv8c6N3tD=7mSvw@mail.gmail.com> <CALx6S35bSAa_zq=HsF-3e9qC-vRNFRu6dn+O4ak4Hi+c=Tmz5A@mail.gmail.com> <79E407F2-13D8-4F64-9A42-ED6BF6141DE9@ericsson.com> <CABcZeBPfT=B+fOXAkPuoEQQHAtJrefXSgnjOpPC7-4zC_myRsA@mail.gmail.com> <D36061F0-F872-4054-ACF0-C9A88FCEC572@ericsson.com> <2d3c909f-b21c-3916-1eb9-db6de5c661e3@huitema.net> <5DC063F2.8040502@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <B74B17C8-A8D7-47F9-9DA2-610A8EB9F3BA@ericsson.com> <CABcZeBMemLcmXdWnstOwa5GFatgp5HcwMo6r-a2A9Etp03xTfA@mail.gmail.com> <5DC1D94A.9040602@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <67CE4313-A4C2-4CC7-972E-CB465D47B7FE@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <67CE4313-A4C2-4CC7-972E-CB465D47B7FE@ericsson.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 12:44:59 -0800
Message-ID: <CABcZeBNFQPOe_BYRgH98cb3TpsY04oZ0SsJUWA=Y+8CHefNmDg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mirja Kuehlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@ericsson.com>
Cc: "gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk" <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, tsvwg IETF list <tsvwg@ietf.org>, "saag@ietf.org" <saag@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a392e805969f83bf"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/mAxEGvphsvXRRr1HGE65OkoHzWE>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] [saag] Comments on draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-08.txt
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2019 20:45:40 -0000

On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 12:34 PM Mirja Kuehlewind <
mirja.kuehlewind@ericsson.com> wrote:

> >> Well, I think what you're hearing is that people think that it is badly
> aligned with the consensus of other parts of the IETF.
>
> What I’m hearing is that 2-3 people think this is not aligned but don’t
> actually say why exactly they think that


I wrote a fairly long note about it, I can understand that you don't agree,
but I don't really think "don't exactly say why they think that" is a fair
characterization.


while there are a bunch of people supporting this document ( throughout the
> whole wg process).
>

Well, it's often the case that a WG has internal support for something, but
then when it gets brought to the wider IETF community, it turns out that
there isn't IETF-wide consensus. I'll leave it to the Chairs and ADs to
determine if that's the case here.

-Ekr


> Mirja
>
> >>
> >> -Ekr
> >
> > Than ks Ekr, but of course, I don't agree on your thoughts. Which is why
> this needs to be carefully considered.
> >
> > Gorry
> >
>