[Technical Errata Reported] RFC6016 (2558)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 12 October 2010 18:07 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64FB23A69DF for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.316
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.316 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.284, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jLwYzJ9m2m-5 for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:07:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2f]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D78A3A69D7 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:07:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 82BA3E06F0; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
To: bsd@cisco.com, flefauch@cisco.com, ashokn@cisco.com, ietfdbh@comcast.net, lars.eggert@nokia.com, jmpolk@cisco.com, gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk
Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6016 (2558)
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20101012180831.82BA3E06F0@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:08:31 -0700
Cc: ah@TR-Sys.de, tsvwg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:07:17 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6016, "Support for the Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP) in Layer 3 VPNs". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6016&eid=2558 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Alfred Hoenes <ah@TR-Sys.de> Section: 8.5, pg.24 Original Text ------------- | The usage of Aggregated VPN-IPv4 (or VPN-IPv6) SESSION object is described in Section 7.3. The AGGREGATE-VPN-IPv4 (respectively, AGGREGATE-IPv6-VPN) SESSION object appears in RSVP messages that ordinarily contain a AGGREGATE-IPv4 (respectively, AGGREGATE-IPv6) SESSION object as defined in [RFC3175] and are sent between ingress PE and egress PE in either direction. The GENERIC-AGGREGATE-VPN-IPv4 | (respectively, AGGREGATE-VPN-IPv6) SESSION object should appear in all RSVP messages that ordinarily contain a GENERIC-AGGREGATE-IPv4 (respectively, GENERIC-AGGREGATE-IPv6) SESSION object as defined in [RFC4860] and are sent between ingress PE and egress PE in either direction. [...] Corrected Text -------------- | The usage of the Aggregated VPN-IPv4 (or VPN-IPv6) SESSION object is described in Section 7.3. The AGGREGATE-VPN-IPv4 (respectively, AGGREGATE-IPv6-VPN) SESSION object appears in RSVP messages that ordinarily contain a AGGREGATE-IPv4 (respectively, AGGREGATE-IPv6) SESSION object as defined in [RFC3175] and are sent between ingress PE and egress PE in either direction. The GENERIC-AGGREGATE-VPN-IPv4 | (respectively, GENERIC-AGGREGATE-VPN-IPv6) SESSION object should appear in all RSVP messages that ordinarily contain a GENERIC-AGGREGATE-IPv4 (respectively, GENERIC-AGGREGATE-IPv6) SESSION object as defined in [RFC4860] and are sent between ingress PE and egress PE in either direction. [...] Notes ----- Rationale: a) missing articles b) reference to wrong object (This classifies the combined Errata Note as Technical.) Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6016 (draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-l3vpn-07) -------------------------------------- Title : Support for the Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP) in Layer 3 VPNs Publication Date : October 2010 Author(s) : B. Davie, F. Le Faucheur, A. Narayanan Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Transport Area Working Group Area : Transport Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6016 (2558) RFC Errata System