[tsvwg] FW: New Version Notification for draft-zhuang-tsvwg-open-cc-architecture-00.txt

"Zhuangyan (Yan)" <zhuangyan.zhuang@huawei.com> Wed, 06 November 2019 03:47 UTC

Return-Path: <zhuangyan.zhuang@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 157D0120033 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 19:47:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FlQilLi-qAkL for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 19:47:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A49F12002E for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 19:47:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml706-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 3D46E10DF8388F1F5470 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 03:47:01 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from nkgeml703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.98.57.159) by lhreml706-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.47) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 03:47:00 +0000
Received: from nkgeml703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.98.57.159) by nkgeml703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.98.57.159) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 11:46:58 +0800
Received: from nkgeml703-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.98.57.159]) by nkgeml703-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.98.57.159]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 11:46:58 +0800
From: "Zhuangyan (Yan)" <zhuangyan.zhuang@huawei.com>
To: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-zhuang-tsvwg-open-cc-architecture-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHVkuQbjvl7pm2vF0ujMd8ypXJ17Kd9edog
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 03:46:58 +0000
Message-ID: <c6d2c3ef2f5b49afaa1b10133006f9c5@huawei.com>
References: <157285363795.16637.14697892567377357964.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <157285363795.16637.14697892567377357964.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.134.248.222]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/mIig5zCUNGoPyaUDkO7ZiENZ_yg>
Subject: [tsvwg] FW: New Version Notification for draft-zhuang-tsvwg-open-cc-architecture-00.txt
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 03:47:05 -0000

Hi all,

Based on feedback in IETF 105, we submitted this draft on the open congestion control architecture (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhuang-tsvwg-open-cc-architecture/). 

This draft proposes a general congestion control framework on NICs to deploy and develop congestion control algorithms and their configurations while also take benefits of hardware offloading by NIC vendors. 

To investigate how different congestion control algorithms performs in a datacenter network, we did some experiments in a simplified storage network. One set uses a single cc algorithm (reno,cubic,dctcp,bbr) for both traffics while the other set uses two cc algorithms for each traffic. The results show that different ccs performs better than the single choice, which is also a reason to use this architecture. We would like to discuss them in the IETF 106 if time allows.

Appreciate your review and comments~

Best Regards,

Yan (on behalf of coauthors)


-----Original Message-----
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] 
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2019 3:47 PM
To: yanlong (A) <yanlong20@huawei.com>om>; Sunwenhao (Sam) <sam.sunwenhao@huawei.com>om>; Zhuangyan (Yan) <zhuangyan.zhuang@huawei.com>om>; Zhuangyan (Yan) <zhuangyan.zhuang@huawei.com>
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-zhuang-tsvwg-open-cc-architecture-00.txt


A new version of I-D, draft-zhuang-tsvwg-open-cc-architecture-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Yan Zhuang and posted to the IETF repository.

Name:		draft-zhuang-tsvwg-open-cc-architecture
Revision:	00
Title:		An Open Congestion Control Architecture for high performance fabrics
Document date:	2019-11-03
Group:		Individual Submission
Pages:		12
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-zhuang-tsvwg-open-cc-architecture-00.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhuang-tsvwg-open-cc-architecture/
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhuang-tsvwg-open-cc-architecture-00
Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-zhuang-tsvwg-open-cc-architecture


Abstract:
   This document describes an open congestion control architecture of
   high performance fabrics for the cloud operators and algorithm
   developers to deploy or develop new congestion control algorithms as
   well as make appropriate configurations for traffics on smart NICs in
   a more efficient and flexible way.

                                                                                  


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat