Re: [tsvwg] L4S DSCP (was: L4S drafts: Next Steps)

Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> Sat, 27 March 2021 20:34 UTC

Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 754503A1167 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 13:34:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.848
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e15NiNfAyok5 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 13:34:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x229.google.com (mail-lj1-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26E6A3A1164 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 13:34:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x229.google.com with SMTP id r20so11390907ljk.4 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 13:34:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=j2FiFr1OKfQ67sumL/9+hKCjoQneFXTjECf7U9q2vhg=; b=tXYMFG/KuO/VLXxnlBKMNtDNaUUNWk1MvuzJnlugKXiPyJOodvTRFDjnxr1h9Wyt8e NClYUHITOiuSPTvEHW7QLzmvw3nlPiuzVPhu2Ll5P/E0LjnfPV8zWxZB36wiaqRESnEY RbySdSZrRX1uBnb6mZBV3iIi8tuKizrJkMsloNUo5dzS+mAVIEFw8Efsx/uuwvrIefdt 9hac6vN6o4SHLJUsEj2j68kTSe3MRwXYsALp5ADdVPtHLuUGwD/4GTvxT0kxk9foHe9B 85lNJXsokrNWxWOQHzfJ6/1cOzzgg7Z8Vn08uPpZ83m7oeEg6wsaMIJNhhMvhJjqtFsg O4Ew==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=j2FiFr1OKfQ67sumL/9+hKCjoQneFXTjECf7U9q2vhg=; b=LciBjs4S9pjP7WMX5hCLC4Nq1ZzsfvG24NvxFsB6ikQakFMZricgu+pGI+tSeISy0R RrobMRHGFxpNod0XP05ePOscOd+WPi9twAWk9wgfAUDB/nlhhpt+cFlg3+OHwu7/b5TD gKGZ85dPdGQgAT5Mo9ebNvYe0WgYs4xMwOVLmdV4vZEAQk+k3+BNFA3D7EtoreHGO41s 3NiZWtxpEdGex2iz2WLoZ7zlkuzzZM3uc2ZjCNgLRwRzLpjTZTRuVq27H9lvZ9LWi+vf dvWUAZTQ8npbpjgtC6xU/xxXPoc/FHIAK/DdGk3DcgMnhwmxyc9MAWEZNACKDaCX1EKE DocA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ExsvvNuT9x2tHsOmsWjhxGx8Hws9Rl/igJcQ1ELPD7GOTsO8j wNGz2Pf7mrTI7SLHOb2RrQY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzSKbQbAl1uOCZHeLYPXIKCa6rgLtoqnhrxTa2RYaRRyaz+xWjYp6TWYgBEbgzG1aYNxcez+A==
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9f54:: with SMTP id v20mr13070215ljk.261.1616877281178; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 13:34:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jonathartonsmbp.lan (178-55-25-11.bb.dnainternet.fi. [178.55.25.11]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w28sm1289500lfk.185.2021.03.27.13.34.40 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 27 Mar 2021 13:34:40 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.7\))
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR0701MB22999F18CBC7874B410B5E13C2609@HE1PR0701MB2299.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2021 22:34:38 +0200
Cc: Pete Heist <pete@heistp.net>, Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>, "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>, Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>, "De Schepper, Koen (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <koen.de_schepper@nokia-bell-labs.com>, tsvwg IETF list <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2A79A917-5CB5-4CD7-9C2F-3A6A293280EB@gmail.com>
References: <MN2PR19MB404527384A1B1DD9CFC2A3D983659@MN2PR19MB4045.namprd19.prod.outlook.com> <6f0ac4bf-bd1a-65cd-1d40-a97d4aa71aab@bobbriscoe.net> <7B4426F9-E1C5-4F88-A264-0D54C809D523@gmail.com> <AM8PR07MB74761AFC8F5BE0F9573DFF32B9629@AM8PR07MB7476.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <6481E606-2458-49D7-B580-8DF7B93494FD@gmx.de> <AM8PR07MB747675E421F0B7A6246C67BEB9619@AM8PR07MB7476.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <9A9D4AC3-43F0-4778-839B-E1E247A3C5FA@gmx.de> <AM8PR07MB7476026EA3AA7AD49622B296B9619@AM8PR07MB7476.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAJU8_nUgNa-W4wf2Vb8sUUqv4XUsSFdVQFUWwrTGw0gDshahiQ@mail.gmail.com> <92b3b23db1dc4ce11162a31acf83c0dd01868a27.camel@heistp.net> <HE1PR0701MB22999F18CBC7874B410B5E13C2609@HE1PR0701MB2299.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
To: Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/ndamwg_He9KfimPxNPnn7-hKPNI>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] L4S DSCP (was: L4S drafts: Next Steps)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2021 20:34:48 -0000

> On 27 Mar, 2021, at 10:00 pm, Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
> In addition, your intended purpose with such an guard DSCP is quite likely to be met with confusion among 3GPP operators as there is no evidence of RFC3168 AQM in 5G systems.

To paraphrase Barnes Wallis:  if you told them that it was to protect *other* networks from the effects of L4S traffic, do you think that might help?

 - Jonathan Morton