Re: [tsvwg] Deprecating RFC 3168 for future ECN experimentation

Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> Fri, 26 March 2021 17:05 UTC

Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 848433A2344 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 10:05:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.847
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.847 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xNf7hZNnFXZO for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 10:05:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x231.google.com (mail-lj1-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 780503A234C for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 10:05:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x231.google.com with SMTP id z8so8140721ljm.12 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 10:05:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=yDBQP+Z5Uon6l3aWTq+D7MWlEGx5nFGqtqS+dTR+zFk=; b=Gh/ar/tNiJp5a07p5/PHo8lJ3Dlo5DwqdZsAYUuy2JN/ifD+QWUX2kkb1x9n8MUjcW uBWIzSPYYxXPmjnFI6CfzDuwi8gQNVH0AlmoZfZlS+UxTuO+vrJiOB4XEnFG8bSG5p7b ZJnAMghkANM7RPMVvMCbJ6P7xBrmAhale1ZG4L0T9pyOWIa5GCqSdjy2lgJAhlzLWvjh nMhQ+ZVz9rRe7C9W1/3GdlRSZ2o8RfWrM6pKzIh0xhqM/jtne8FE/NsJKruAM0uHFzdQ tuZzhcMATR7aqrmlBxr8b2mROW8RNTO3Y86ac+OA0ckJ5SyFhUReOX6+8399cYGIAXrZ clDA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=yDBQP+Z5Uon6l3aWTq+D7MWlEGx5nFGqtqS+dTR+zFk=; b=YbUyrhIMBBIXWzNU1j2vVgt71yYgP+fbOEG6yLwRvgkTrIAsnIIj5wRJrNgtSlA/3u IXmElR+eCXK68QAHSHfNJzhTB7j3aiUG28jLQ63aiVVHQRVGt1rh1B0wyU/CmZrUJBn/ NepXOboXEGrJB5cS/VxdG6drhCBhAocK8ZT8FHQRf4+SlADFtubDgnHFVDI5JodkmYcU RtLLXsRcEXfdt50kP49ksVdjIowbnIIoLB7GW5Pp3Yn/7nOcmTAYVEXMo3v5lR/uAj/9 f9MwvBEaHQtxD6QtR3aopu7NJEne6MxuKoOridj9sjblVf2oQZmtbIxERI7k6gsVZl5/ EBJQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530S8T4AkMgwsjaTSRbH3UnZn0YpRKkJU564c9nR0m4YJJElZMzi AMXTH0Zo0FISKgWp801tJw6MWgZLULg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzvEsng07QY5k0vKKDbJpWMRKO2ORn4L9qY+2Vo5nyCPsybTpvPwTgYKPlWs5lUwPtXbo3w+A==
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:1649:: with SMTP id 9mr10078717ljw.74.1616778342780; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 10:05:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jonathartonsmbp.lan (178-55-25-11.bb.dnainternet.fi. [178.55.25.11]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j22sm923855lfr.37.2021.03.26.10.05.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 26 Mar 2021 10:05:42 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.7\))
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1b673100019174d056c44339d3b1758df058a2aa.camel@petri-meat.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 19:05:41 +0200
Cc: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <DAF14042-52D7-415B-8DA6-DFDBE830AEC3@gmail.com>
References: <1b673100019174d056c44339d3b1758df058a2aa.camel@petri-meat.com>
To: Steven Blake <slblake@petri-meat.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/oeopcakefbhaJFzDpOEKOa7dPRY>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Deprecating RFC 3168 for future ECN experimentation
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 17:05:56 -0000

> On 26 Mar, 2021, at 7:01 pm, Steven Blake <slblake@petri-meat.com> wrote:
> 
> Now, *if it is not WG consensus* that any existing RFC 3168 ECN
> deployments can be safely ignored, then I *strongly urge* the WG *to
> not adopt* experimental proposals that place burden and/or risk on
> networks that have deployed it.

As is probably no surprise, the above is the position I support.

 - Jonathan Morton