[tsvwg] RFC 8837 on Differentiated Services Code Point (DSCP) Packet Markings for WebRTC QoS
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Mon, 18 January 2021 23:32 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0907D3A151A; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 15:32:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5bbgWp0D8BPC; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 15:32:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 982003A1451; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 15:31:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 5716FF407AC; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 15:31:10 -0800 (PST)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, tsvwg@ietf.org
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20210118233110.5716FF407AC@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 15:31:10 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/p1GnRVn544AV706usdH8P8iisxI>
Subject: [tsvwg] RFC 8837 on Differentiated Services Code Point (DSCP) Packet Markings for WebRTC QoS
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 23:32:50 -0000
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 8837
Title: Differentiated Services Code Point (DSCP)
Packet Markings for WebRTC QoS
Author: P. Jones,
S. Dhesikan,
C. Jennings,
D. Druta
Status: Standards Track
Stream: IETF
Date: January 2021
Mailbox: paulej@packetizer.com,
sdhesikan@gmail.com,
fluffy@cisco.com,
dd5826@att.com
Pages: 9
Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None
I-D Tag: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-18.txt
URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8837
DOI: 10.17487/RFC8837
Networks can provide different forwarding treatments for individual
packets based on Differentiated Services Code Point (DSCP) values on
a per-hop basis. This document provides the recommended DSCP values
for web browsers to use for various classes of Web Real-Time
Communication (WebRTC) traffic.
This document is a product of the Transport Area Working Group Working Group of the IETF.
This is now a Proposed Standard.
STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the
standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this
memo is unlimited.
This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk
Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.
The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC