Re: [Tsvwg] interoperability (was Re: WGLC for Port Randomization starts now (April 1st))

Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org> Wed, 27 May 2009 17:52 UTC

Return-Path: <mallman@icir.org>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9830728C140 for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 May 2009 10:52:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.479
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.479 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.120, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I72-C5aUT4qt for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 May 2009 10:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pork.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (pork.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU [192.150.186.19]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E908228C0DC for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 May 2009 10:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from guns.icir.org (adsl-69-222-35-58.dsl.bcvloh.ameritech.net [69.222.35.58]) by pork.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n4RHqlZj014336; Wed, 27 May 2009 10:52:47 -0700
Received: from lawyers.icir.org (unknown [69.222.35.58]) by guns.icir.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E671F3A5F20F; Wed, 27 May 2009 13:52:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lawyers.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lawyers.icir.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B516F297A27; Wed, 27 May 2009 13:52:41 -0400 (EDT)
To: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
From: Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org>
In-Reply-To: <4A1D7CAC.5020500@gont.com.ar>
Organization: International Computer Science Institute (ICSI)
Song-of-the-Day: Lawyers, Guns and Money
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="--------ma32233-1"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 13:52:41 -0400
Sender: mallman@icir.org
Message-Id: <20090527175241.B516F297A27@lawyers.icir.org>
Cc: Alfred Hönes <ah@tr-sys.de>, "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>, tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] interoperability (was Re: WGLC for Port Randomization starts now (April 1st))
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mallman@icir.org
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 17:52:36 -0000

> FWIW, I could expand "interoperability problems" to "delays in the
> establishment of connections or data corruption" if necessary. -- I
> just thought that that was too much detail.

I prefer this.  It's what you mean.

allman