IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] Review comments on a careful read of the L4S ID

"C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com> Sat, 08 May 2021 15:15 UTC

Return-Path: <heard@pobox.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A22713A1B5C for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 May 2021 08:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g_eljR_Ifzut for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 May 2021 08:15:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (pb-smtp20.pobox.com [173.228.157.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF37E3A1B5B for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 8 May 2021 08:15:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E01413646D for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 8 May 2021 11:15:20 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h= mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject :to:cc:content-type; s=sasl; bh=R3QmqGH5PkHIObOhfqpt/JWL0L0gpo2n 8bUH9heeYJE=; b=wZyj3Xbh/COoSZrU3PK9F38sl31cBKjQ6WcWbFc/q/lOWxzc wrHiEPs69g/fLVDJ8YGCqiDVmMKrZaI7emgyy2GeXc6fcGZnEh4Rv5wG8UTPRWqB hyToYw5svgy5YXZwGxIBydxUxYTKhcPmgodW9VIB2UJwgPHSklhXdOcZ0Hk=
Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46EEC13646C for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 8 May 2021 11:15:20 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
Received: from mail-io1-f47.google.com (unknown [209.85.166.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B01AD136465 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 8 May 2021 11:15:16 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
Received: by mail-io1-f47.google.com with SMTP id z24so10748691ioi.3 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 08 May 2021 08:15:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5317msmGdAAKXY02zgKET4ZmMmJoxMB/22h5NURMffQWXT0T1MoB Kq99a7Sg4bSd2HTR98CKfobSNVAXuKAp2maGCuw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw/F/i3st+w5AchG0g0kzigwVR071kzmuRcI/aDPCdzjknGeiCS042FjD4Ev3Jfm6C15UQlryYYgjXtvenmn9E=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:e80f:: with SMTP id f15mr9323466ioh.64.1620486915473; Sat, 08 May 2021 08:15:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <634676ca-272d-d616-c352-b38446cf7aab@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <a97fa9fd-3721-af32-a486-7c966d7d108c@tomh.org> <MN2PR19MB40458998C271D5227886866183589@MN2PR19MB4045.namprd19.prod.outlook.com> <1323d4b6-326e-f35d-b481-4921d5f52b8e@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <5F9FF409-67B8-4F47-8587-260C2130AD99@gmx.de> <8a4129f5-e449-7237-e664-3a04b4177f1b@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <491B6198-346D-4F16-B5D5-3D475B2E09FA@gmx.de> <5ee8f2b4-28a3-d24a-d6f7-caa3b8e22756@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <5ee8f2b4-28a3-d24a-d6f7-caa3b8e22756@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
From: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
Date: Sat, 08 May 2021 08:15:03 -0700
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CACL_3VHaheyR=4GKL4BNYprXxEubMkA49WQKQ3uzn=WZVgYusg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACL_3VHaheyR=4GKL4BNYprXxEubMkA49WQKQ3uzn=WZVgYusg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Cc: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>, TSVWG <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f5c57c05c1d30219"
X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 31DA78D2-B010-11EB-B718-E43E2BB96649-06080547!pb-smtp20.pobox.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/rKaFP1tcrwNvLprfeXuPLY7OWN8>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Review comments on a careful read of the L4S ID
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 May 2021 15:15:30 -0000

On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 11:22 PM Gorry Fairhurst  wrote:

> [GF] You seem to keep arguing in a direction that would result in
> obsoleting RFC3168 before we progress L4S, but I don't agree this
> ordering is needed. The proposal I see is that the deployment takes
> place and then the IETF has the option to decide what happens next.
>

Seeing the word ***deployment*** instead of the word ***experiment***
in the last sentence above,  I have to agree with Sebastian on this point.

Mike Heard

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status