Re: [tsvwg] WGLC Announcement for draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-udp-encaps-14 to confirm changes - 5th April 2013

[Michael Welzl <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

I'd also like to express support. I read the draft and it looks good to me, and surely it's useful.

Cheers,
Michael


On 2. apr. 2013, at 22:46, Thomas Dreibholz wrote:

> Dear Gorry,
> 
> I would like to express my support for the draft draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-udp-
> encaps-14. It is a very useful extension to make use of SCTP in certain setups 
> where SCTP is not possible otherwise, e.g. when blocked by firewalls or not 
> supported by operating system kernels.
> 
> As part of my work on the sctplib userland SCTP implementation, I have also 
> implemented UDP encapsulation in sctplib. I intensively used it in sctplib-
> based RSerPool setups.
> 
> 
> Fredag 22. mars 2013 12.19.40 skrev Gorry Fairhurst:
>> This email announces the start of a working group last call for
>> draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-udp-encaps-14, "UDP Encapsulation of SCTP Packets
>> for End-Host to End-Host Communication".  This document has completed an
>> IETF LC and was updated after IESG review. This is now thought to be
>> ready to proceed to be published as a PS by RFC-Ed. Please send any
>> comments to the TSVWG list.
>> 
>> The draft is available at:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-udp-encaps-14
>> 
>> Summary of main changes:
>> 
>> * Clarification that the focus is on encapsulation between SCTP endpoints.
>> 
>> * UNSAF considerations added.
>> 
>> * Change from UDP checksum MUST be computed for SCTP/UDP/IPv6 to UDP
>> checksum SHOULD be computed for SCTP/UDP/IPv6 to reflect recently
>> changed UDP/IPv6 checksum handling, with rationale provided.
>> 
>> A diff between the version submitted to the IESG and the current version
>> can be viewed using:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-udp-encaps-07.txt&u
>> rl2=draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-udp-encaps-14.txt
>> 
>> This shortened last call will end on Friday 5th April 2013.
>> 
>> Emails saying "I support" or "I don't support" publication with these
>> changes are also most  helpful in judging the WG consensus.
>> 
>> Please note another running SCTP WGLC also below.
>> 
>> James and Gorry
>> (TSVWG Chairs)
>> [e-mail]
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> 
>> This email announces the start of a working group last call for
>> draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-sack-immediately-02.txt, "SACK-IMMEDIATELY
>> Extension for the Stream Control Transmission Protocol". This document
>> is now thought to be ready to proceed to be published as a PS. Please
>> send any comments to the TSVWG list.
>> 
>> The draft is available at:
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-sack-immediately/
>> 
>> The last call will run for TWO weeks, ending Friday 5th April 2013.
>> 
>> Emails saying "I support" or "I don't support" publication are also most
>>  helpful in judging the WG consensus. Please let us know if this draft
>> is useful and seems to provide the correct advice.
>> 
>> James, David and Gorry
>> (TSVWG Chairs)
>> [e-mail]
> 
> -- 
> Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Med vennlig hilsen
> 
> =======================================================================
> Thomas Dreibholz
> 
> Simula Research Laboratory
> Simula Innovation AS, Network Systems Group
> Visiting address: Martin Linges vei 17, 1364 Fornebu, Norway
> Mailing address:  P.O.Box 134, 1325 Lysaker, Norway
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> E-Mail:     [e-mail]
> Homepage:   http://simula.no/people/dreibh
> =======================================================================