From rvanrheenen@amsl.com Tue Mar 19 09:26:29 2024 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD11C14CF12 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 09:26:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.208 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.208 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f3y0tbk6lXyz for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 09:26:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07DF1C14F70E for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 09:26:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AE92424B427; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 09:26:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3oiRfFvim3Ta; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 09:26:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [IPv6:2601:641:300:5fb0:498a:472a:af0b:f3e9] (unknown [IPv6:2601:641:300:5fb0:498a:472a:af0b:f3e9]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 76AC9424B426; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 09:26:25 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\)) From: Rebecca VanRheenen In-Reply-To: <20240315164733.7A22176350@rfcpa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 09:26:24 -0700 Cc: tuexen@freebsd.org, randall@lakerest.net, tuexen@fh-muenster.de, kee@kamstrup.com, tsvwg@ietf.org, RFC Editor Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20240315164733.7A22176350@rfcpa.amsl.com> To: Martin Duke X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [tsvwg] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9260 (7852) X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: Transport Area Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 16:26:29 -0000 Hi Martin, We are unable to verify this erratum that the submitter marked as = editorial, so we changed the Type to =E2=80=9CTechnical=E2=80=9D. As = Stream Approver, please review and set the Status and Type accordingly = (see the definitions at https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata-definitions/). You may review the report at:=20 https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7852 Information on how to verify errata reports can be found at:=20 https://www.rfc-editor.org/how-to-verify/ Further information on errata can be found at:=20 https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php Thank you. RFC Editor/rv > On Mar 15, 2024, at 9:47 AM, RFC Errata System = wrote: >=20 > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9260, > "Stream Control Transmission Protocol". >=20 > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7852 >=20 > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Michael T=C3=BCxen >=20 > Section: 8.5. >=20 > Original Text > ------------- > When receiving an SCTP packet, the endpoint MUST ensure that the > value in the Verification Tag field of the received SCTP packet > matches its own tag. >=20 > Corrected Text > -------------- > When receiving an SCTP packet, the endpoint MUST first ensure that the > value in the Verification Tag field of the received SCTP packet > matches its own tag before processing any chunks or changing its = state. >=20 > Notes > ----- > State explicitly that the check of the verification tag needs to be = done before any processing of the packet. >=20 > Thanks to Jake Ginesin, Max von Hippel, and Cristina Nita-Rotaru for = reporting issue and discussing it with me. >=20 > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it=20 > will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party =20 > will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. >=20 > -------------------------------------- > RFC9260 (draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-bis-19) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Stream Control Transmission Protocol > Publication Date : June 2022 > Author(s) : R. Stewart, M. T=C3=BCxen, K. Nielsen > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Transport and Services Working Group > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG >=20