IETF Logo Mail Archive

[tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3168 (6494)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 24 March 2021 20:29 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 132163A35B6 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 13:29:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WSnb0g8XtaNS for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 13:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2514F3A357E for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 13:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 072ECF40721; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 13:29:00 -0700 (PDT)
To: kk@teraoptic.com, floyd@aciri.org, black_david@emc.com, martin.h.duke@gmail.com, Zaheduzzaman.Sarker@ericsson.com, david.black@dell.com, gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk, wes@mti-systems.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: touch@strayalpha.com, tsvwg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20210324202900.072ECF40721@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 13:29:00 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/sHKw9rKQUR9YAa49H6X8dRJH7DU>
Subject: [tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3168 (6494)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 20:29:17 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3168,
"The Addition of Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) to IP".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6494

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>

Section: Header

Original Text
-------------
Updates: 2474, 2401, 793 

Corrected Text
--------------
Updates: 2474, 2401, 793, 791

Notes
-----
This is the first standards-track RFC to assign the two unused bits of the IP TOS byte to ECN. Granted it was suggested in RFC2481, but that was experimental and unable to update RFC791 because it would create a downref.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC3168 (draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-04)
--------------------------------------
Title               : The Addition of Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) to IP
Publication Date    : September 2001
Author(s)           : K. Ramakrishnan, S. Floyd, D. Black
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Transport Area Working Group
Area                : Transport
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email