IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] travel funds for ietf for the next SCE talk?

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Fri, 10 May 2019 14:00 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F368120021 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 May 2019 07:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jil7vNpRShhQ for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 May 2019 07:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x735.google.com (mail-qk1-x735.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::735]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EF2B1200A2 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 May 2019 07:00:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x735.google.com with SMTP id a132so3615834qkb.13 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 May 2019 07:00:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=O3/sNKfNSW6hgFCXWVOtwtDhPr1/Z3eoJOg41+o7so0=; b=s333RBG6oEkDoP7inZGCJqFqDprnlb+YliB5ZEujqSkZ6R9z4GxfLyUQAkWYAULP5Z LsheJ2EzFRUDRUHRbcpH5+tfIPvO/Xbdb8y3nXGNLWhd2T8Yl3XGJXgGgsmMviyoT6mM I/qJM+8D8ZyMA9aCTsQLz3b7pytA+9Yx/QWH4cB2tXMP1vexgihcd7qxrtXgaRb0maV0 Zs3LyrHP2Hs/a84MZLRxPdvjKNLRk0B+U92+21avgSwCGExsKrYkPpjtZ+jTo3RhZF2N 6aJjWa1Xs1h0hbH3zkUnYsLQxnmZLputb2HmB4ttqXA//QUZYesyRnIROIJHTxr5zn3p iwGA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=O3/sNKfNSW6hgFCXWVOtwtDhPr1/Z3eoJOg41+o7so0=; b=uVRc4eh1obIVAYbdYI4XZyHQIUBB2Ya25cZ+r+hFt+s9FhMik92d6tNOMdy7UdXOUP Zk7jCabBoUprd7vfOYUOeRGc7xQZfTyS9bU3jXFb2OHAJr3LAuLYgkcpkWriZCZH316t JIAvTU7QqXx2VJae19VPPkUAicWqJ2BeIxXZ8v5H5kW+kGlgWRLuDIygvuQuBRZiA5/L LZRWmLrSKnBTtYy94W09Dder/eXfp7iuqpunef/GLr0IGfPkR8h2+dCpmo3Y7TMNwl8K LrzVBHzua49XeI+Wp+6qa9FVupLyC+LtH2ZKHtMwlAMOE3UyWmQCQ0AArbiawvXiBORe Mevw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWWXjf7abXxo9tIbDcMQyhAW5pIlEPaRSfOejdGdLwPTis4gdhC hsGyh4cLZtmDJHgAiUBTK0r37Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwMesGxdjimZiQUZRPFJV93dYUFAXGr7mDGV9wzTzrlvSaQCppcSFUvN/pXaV1LTzR6l5ZOtw==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:b846:: with SMTP id i67mr8863499qkf.179.1557496803156; Fri, 10 May 2019 07:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.10.34] (c-73-186-137-119.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [73.186.137.119]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j4sm3285339qti.49.2019.05.10.07.00.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 10 May 2019 07:00:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <4C8193B9-586C-4ED9-B01E-6BA37071600A@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_533A965A-B804-46CC-A8A7-FCDF65F04DB1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.2\))
Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 10:00:00 -0400
In-Reply-To: <C302B225-7806-4D6D-9ECE-FA3EFD6D7CA4@strayalpha.com>
Cc: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, tsvwg IETF list <tsvwg@ietf.org>, ECN-Sane <ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
To: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
References: <CAA93jw7eZ0Rfvc+tUKx0mG_Bdxqos-DTBn=ojYJCM0UCh38ScA@mail.gmail.com> <HE1PR0701MB25221DA057496B1A89FD391B95390@HE1PR0701MB2522.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAA93jw4V6328H2awWmSnhJnKgKASqy-9yXY=ke3JgcMxLiRY2A@mail.gmail.com> <C302B225-7806-4D6D-9ECE-FA3EFD6D7CA4@strayalpha.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/sVLnXRskMCruvEF8vAGsiVJ2Z5Q>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] travel funds for ietf for the next SCE talk?
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 14:00:07 -0000

On May 10, 2019, at 9:47 AM, Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> wrote:
> The only  people who get a fully free ride that I know of are the IEEE Comsoc Board. 

Hm.  I’ve never paid to attend IETF.  Granted, this is not because IETF comped me, but because I was fortunate enough to have an employer who could afford to send me at no cost to me.

This model unfortunately doesn’t work for open source developers who are not on the payroll of a company with deep pockets.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email