[tsvwg] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8311 (5649)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sun, 10 March 2019 19:25 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19EE31200ED for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 12:25:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PwHy9ESygrpU for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 12:25:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9206A12008F for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 12:25:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 4BA9AB81D82; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 12:25:49 -0700 (PDT)
To: david.black@dell.com, spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com, ietf@kuehlewind.net, david.black@emc.com, gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk, wes@mti-systems.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: ietf@bobbriscoe.net, tsvwg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20190310192549.4BA9AB81D82@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 12:25:49 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/uWzw0YFc2SIncDylspAJTEYaVdA>
Subject: [tsvwg] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8311 (5649)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 19:25:54 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8311, "Relaxing Restrictions on Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) Experimentation". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5649 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Bob Briscoe <ietf@bobbriscoe.net> Section: 3. Original Text ------------- see Appendix B.1 of [ECN-L4S]. Corrected Text -------------- see Appendix C.1 of [ECN-L4S]. Notes ----- At the end of Section 8. there is another reference to the same information in the same Appendix: See Appendix C.1 of [ECN-L4S] for discussion of alternatives to the ECN nonce. So we have to change one to be consistent with the other. Let's use C.1, because that is the current number of the appendix in the relevant draft. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8311 (draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation-08) -------------------------------------- Title : Relaxing Restrictions on Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) Experimentation Publication Date : January 2018 Author(s) : D. Black Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Transport Area Working Group Area : Transport Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [tsvwg] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8311 (5649) RFC Errata System
- Re: [tsvwg] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8311 (… Black, David